SpaceCoastVol
Jacked up on moonshine and testosterone
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 55,870
- Likes
- 69,962
All you and anarchy supporters have done is babble. You have yet to shoot down any opposing points or show 1 example of an anarchy system working in history.
What do you mean? You explicitly said the free market would not deliver mail and I pointed out that they are banned from delivering mail because the USPS doesn't want competition. If that's not shooting down an opposing viewpoint, then what is?
There are no satisfactory examples of anarchy in history, but that' a useless point. There weren't any satisfactory examples of democracy until there were.
personal freedom? Tough call because freedom to do something doesn't mean freedom from consequences of the action.
In the end, in all explanations of anarchy I've heard you aren't free of consequences; it's just that some individual or group may be the inflicter of punishment rather than some formal government.
So, technically I'm free now to do whatever I want but the laws may mean I face consequences.
In AnCap, it will be Huff's private security firm that smacks me down and in the OPs' it will be a bunch of smelly hippies
They are not banned from delivering mail. You can drop a letter in a Fedex envelope, box, container ext. and ship it anywhere they will deliver. They just can't put it in your mailbox.
Correct there are no satisfactory examples because it's an untenable system for prosperity.
But there is a price floor for the service. IIRC, they can't charge below $1.47 or something like that. I can't remember exactly, but effectively it's a ban on competing with the USPS $0.49 stamps, or whatever it is now.
What do you think the government has done to keep Verizon from buying cell towers?
You are correct, a barter or precious metals system can work. It would slow down commerce to a standstill.
Once we left the gold standard paper money is just that, paper.
to the first paragraph, yeah sure a small commune might survive, when protected by the government. irony abounds in that. and i would argue in those cases that they do work it is not from a lack of oversite but rather them working within a very confined system. and the system works as long as there are no major problems. we (humans) banded together to form the first governments to solve problems we couldn't handle on our own. same thing here with the anarchists.
agree on the last part. we need to heavily redo our government. i just don't see how the anarchy works on a state or national level.