LawVol13
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 11,524
- Likes
- 0
Nick Saban, Mack Brown, Brady Hoke, Mark D'Antonio (went to Cincinnati (basically mid-major))
Those are a few off the top of my head.
That's fair. Here's the problem I see with that. His resume gets a permanent L on it if he leaves here now. AD's love to see resumes that constantly advance and winning at every stop. Leaving here for another DC would hurt both of those.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I would be inclined to agree with that opinion Law.If Sirmon, Baggett, and Wilcox leave (not saying this is likely or unlikely to happen; it's purely a hypothetical), would you be in favor of keeping Derek Dooley?
Remember to consider that he's most likely going to also have to fire offensive assistants, so he would be faced with having to essentially hire an entirely new staff while being squarely on the hot seat. Consider whether you think this would affect his ab
slitty to hire quality assistants.
My answer is, under this scenario, I would be in favor of firing Dooley.
Look it's obvious you have an agenda vs. Dooley and that's fine. But the only one that is going to get fired is Hiestand. Even then, his college resume was pretty great. He also got us Baggett, who Bama went hard after and I believe the Cowboys also did, Sirmon, Wilcox, and Russell. All 4 of these coaches have and will always receive interest from other teams.
On a side note, as Skeeter said, Thompson's departure could actually be a blessing in disguise. There's a certain guy on the west coast (Cal) that Wilcox would definitely push hard to get here. If so, we would've upgraded the position coach.
So they can Dooley and pay him 5 million..
Hire Charlie at 3 million
Pay Charlies boyout of 2.5 million..
10.5 million dollar move in first year.
do you think they pursue that risk?? No assurance that Charlie can turn program so it is a big risk.
If Sirmon, Baggett, and Wilcox leave (not saying this is likely or unlikely to happen; it's purely a hypothetical), would you be in favor of keeping Derek Dooley?
Remember to consider that he's most likely going to also have to fire offensive assistants, so he would be faced with having to essentially hire an entirely new staff while being squarely on the hot seat. Consider whether you think this would affect his ability to hire quality assistants.
My answer is, under this scenario, I would be in favor of firing Dooley.
