Hypothetical Situation...

#326
#326
DD4ME said:
That worse case scenario is why I asked if anyone here would promote Wilcox to head coach to keep him and all other staff and let go of DD and JC since it's rumored AD wanted JC gone anyway. That seems like a raw deal too and an unproven coach in Wilcox but you'd have some continuity on all but offense.
Click to expand...

Yes...I would trade right now...fair or not.
 
#327
#327
tvols75 said:
Look it's obvious you have an agenda vs. Dooley and that's fine. But the only one that is going to get fired is Hiestand. Even then, his college resume was pretty great. He also got us Baggett, who Bama went hard after and I believe the Cowboys also did, Sirmon, Wilcox, and Russell. All 4 of these coaches have and will always receive interest from other teams.
Click to expand...

If he has an agenda against Dooley, then what does that mean you have? An affair with Dooley? Please.

Oh, and since you are going to anyways, yes, I got the depth chart on the defensive line wrong.
 
#328
#328
zjcvols said:
If he has an agenda against Dooley, then what does that mean you have? An affair with Dooley? Please.

Oh, and since you are going to anyways, yes, I got the depth chart on the defensive line wrong.
Click to expand...

My position is clear: Dooley by the end of this recruiting cycle will have laid a foundation that has re-stocked the depth and talent on this roster. He has one year to prove he can win with it. If not, bye bye. If that's an affair, I'm a terrible adulterer.
 
#329
#329
tvols75 said:
My position is clear: Dooley by the end of this recruiting cycle will have laid a foundation that has re-stocked the depth and talent on this roster. He has one year to prove he can win with it. If not, bye bye. If that's an affair, I'm a terrible adulterer.
Click to expand...

I think it's obvious that law doesn't have an agenda against Dooley. I think you should look at some of his earlier threads/blogs from earlier in the year.
 
#330
#330
tvols75 said:
My position is clear: Dooley by the end of this recruiting cycle will have laid a foundation that has re-stocked the depth and talent on this roster. He has one year to prove he can win with it. If not, bye bye. If that's an affair, I'm a terrible adulterer.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure you and LawVol have the same idea.

Unless you're referring to the 2013 season.
 
#331
#331
tvols75 said:
My position is clear: Dooley by the end of this recruiting cycle will have laid a foundation that has re-stocked the depth and talent on this roster. He has one year to prove he can win with it. If not, bye bye. If that's an affair, I'm a terrible adulterer.
Click to expand...

+1
 
#332
#332
tvols75 said:
My position is clear: Dooley by the end of this recruiting cycle will have laid a foundation that has re-stocked the depth and talent on this roster. He has one year to prove he can win with it. If not, bye bye. If that's an affair, I'm a terrible adulterer.
Click to expand...

It has always been three to earn a fourth....fair or not. With next year's schedule the talent to go 8-4 is there.
 
#333
#333
tvols75 said:
Look it's obvious you have an agenda vs. Dooley and that's fine.
Click to expand...

Complete and utter garbage. Simply recognizing what's staring you in the face that things don't look good for Dooley doesn't mean you have "an agenda" against him. I like the man; I wish he could succeed, but I also recognize that it looks doubtful if he will. You're just a sheep that sticks his head up the coach's ass and refuses to accept reality, and when someone else even dare to question said coach, you resort to saying things, "you have an agenda" or taking elementary cheap shots at people. That's why you're a joke.
 
#335
#335
LawVol13 said:
And yea, you should definitely have lots of confidence he can pick good coaches since he's more than likely going to have to fire at least 2 of his current staff that he hired.
Click to expand...

Let's be fair.. Chaney was held over mainly to make the transition easier on the players and he's prolly only gonna have to fire Hiestand. Don't act like Dooley hasn't made good hires.
 
#336
#336
I don't know if I've ever heard of a coach taking this much heat in year two and survive
 
Last edited:
#337
#337
LawVol13 said:
Complete and utter garbage. Simply recognizing what's staring you in the face that things don't look good for Dooley doesn't mean you have "an agenda" against him. I like the man; I wish he could succeed, but I also recognize that it looks doubtful if he will. You're just a sheep that sticks his head up the coach's ass and refuses to accept reality, and when someone else even dare to question said coach, you resort to saying things, "you have an agenda" or taking elementary cheap shots at people. That's why you're a joke.
Click to expand...

For some reason, it's ironic to call someone out for taking cheap shots when you have a history of name calling on this board. But anyways, there is nothing staring anyone in the face. You are basing this on a scenario that is not likely to occur. And I've made my stance clear on Dooley so being a sheep simply doesn't apply but nice try.
 
#338
#338
LawVol13 said:
Complete and utter garbage. Simply recognizing what's staring you in the face that things don't look good for Dooley doesn't mean you have "an agenda" against him. I like the man; I wish he could succeed, but I also recognize that it looks doubtful if he will. You're just a sheep that sticks his head up the coach's ass and refuses to accept reality, and when someone else even dare to question said coach, you resort to saying things, "you have an agenda" or taking elementary cheap shots at people. That's why you're a joke.
Click to expand...

Reality? I thought this was hypothetical.
 
#339
#339
volfan_28 said:
Let's be fair.. Chaney was held over mainly to make the transition easier on the players and he's prolly only gonna have to fire Hiestand. Don't act like Dooley hasn't made good hires.
Click to expand...

Law's logic: Can't credit Dooley for Thompson but you credit him for Chaney.
 
#340
#340
volfan_28 said:
Let's be fair.. Chaney was held over mainly to make the transition easier on the players and he's prolly only gonna have to fire Hiestand. Don't act like Dooley hasn't made good hires.
Click to expand...

Well, tvols75 gives Dooley credit for Lance Thompson, so he should get credit for Chaney as well under that scenario.
 
#341
#341
zjcvols said:
If he has an agenda against Dooley, then what does that mean you have? An affair with Dooley? Please.

Oh, and since you are going to anyways, yes, I got the depth chart on the defensive line wrong.
Click to expand...

by the way, you got the depth chart on the defensive line wrong
 
#347
#347
volfan_28 said:
Reality? I thought this was hypothetical.
Click to expand...

This absolutely is a hypothetical. My opinion is that Dooley is unlikely to succeed here. At best, I think next year will be his last year. I see no reason to think otherwise, and if the entire staff either is fired or leaves for other jobs, that makes me feel that Dooley's failure is a near certainty. I don't take pleasure in that; I honestly like Dooley and hope he succeeds, but I don't think he will.
 
#348
#348
tvols75 said:
Really? You credited Kiffin for Thompson and then said Dooley has to fire two of his coaches, one being Chaney. Which one is it?
Click to expand...

I think Chaney needs to be fired. You credited Dooley for landing Thompson, so I stayed with your standard and credited Dooley for keeping Chaney. You're the one that needs to decide which one it is.

Even if we were to consider that Kiffin hired Chaney like he hired Thompson, Kiffin didn't have Chaney calling plays. Dooley does, and we scored 7 points against UK.
 
#349
#349
LawVol13 said:
This absolutely is a hypothetical. My opinion is that Dooley is unlikely to succeed here. At best, I think next year will be his last year. I see no reason to think otherwise, and if the entire staff either is fired or leaves for other jobs, that makes me feel that Dooley's failure is a near certainty. I don't take pleasure in that; I honestly like Dooley and hope he succeeds, but I don't think he will.
Click to expand...

And I have absolutely no problem with that view. He will be here next year and the results will determine his fate. That is pretty much what I've said all along.
 
#350
#350
LawVol13 said:
This absolutely is a hypothetical. My opinion is that Dooley is unlikely to succeed here. At best, I think next year will be his last year. I see no reason to think otherwise, and if the entire staff either is fired or leaves for other jobs, that makes me feel that Dooley's failure is a near certainty. I don't take pleasure in that; I honestly like Dooley and hope he succeeds, but I don't think he will.
Click to expand...
This sums it up nicely.

I'll take it a step further and say that it looks to me like Dooley is in way over his head. I hope I'm wrong.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top