VOL Campbell
Tennessee Saturday Night
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2009
- Messages
- 589
- Likes
- 1,202
He is very good indeed and would have been a great hire here IMO. He was my recommended pick. But he wasn’t chosen, so I am moving on and want to do all I can to help Coach Huepel succeed. Water under the bridge can no longer be drank.Liberty top 25. With half a team of FCS players as he put it.
Made Ole Miss better than they've been since Archie.
Beat Saban twice.
Was 10-2 first year at Arkansas State. Broke records first year as a coordinator.
Went 8-4 and then 12-1 at lambuth.
Won two state titles coaching high school football (in Memphis)
He even coach a high school girls basketball team to 4 state titles including 7 total trips to the state championships for chrissakes!
People obviously have noooo idea how good he is.
I'd like to see the admin held accountable for poor hires and poor strategies.
Hugh Freeze will probably be available in 3 years if it doesn't work out with Heupel. The NCAA problems should be passed and Freeze's recovery/penance should be near complete if he keeps his nose clean.Topic for discussion. What is worse....a proven coach that can compete with upper tier programs and the additional NCAA sanctions that would accompany him or a less proven coach with possibly fewer NCAA sanctions? As we see less experienced coaches hired and multiple coaches turning down offers, it certainly appears the overall strategy of the administration appears questionable at best. Would it have been a better strategy to focus less on throwing Pruitt under the bus and the program with it? Perhaps offering a portion of his salary to keep his mouth shut and go away while doing it's best NOT to expose recruiting violations? With Freeze....or even Kiffin for that matter....lobbying for the position, would coordinators be turning those coaches down right now. I just have trouble believing that coaches would turning down top tier money while working for a proven SEC coach. Just seems like UT is still playing checkers while other programs are playing chess at every level of the administration.
lol...based on what exacty?...other than looking through orange glasses and he is the current coach.You can be certain that CJH will be coaching Tennessee a lot longer than three seasons.
View attachment 350643
I'm sure there are problems attached to him, but by all accounts he has turned his life around and can obviously still win. The point im making is...what baggage could be worse than letting the current admin dig us into a bigger hole for 3-4 years. We just hired a rb coach whose BEST offense he ever fielded was ranked 107th in the nation. His other offenses were 125th, 124th and 115th. Just don't see many recruits getting excited about that....or current players for that matter.And UT will still have the opportunity to outbid them if they believe that strongly in him.
There is something going on there either with Freeze or hiring programs. There were several jobs open and he didn't get strongly pursued.
Topic for discussion. What is worse....a proven coach that can compete with upper tier programs and the additional NCAA sanctions that would accompany him or a less proven coach with possibly fewer NCAA sanctions? As we see less experienced coaches hired and multiple coaches turning down offers, it certainly appears the overall strategy of the administration appears questionable at best. Would it have been a better strategy to focus less on throwing Pruitt under the bus and the program with it? Perhaps offering a portion of his salary to keep his mouth shut and go away while doing it's best NOT to expose recruiting violations? With Freeze....or even Kiffin for that matter....lobbying for the position, would coordinators be turning those coaches down right now. I just have trouble believing that coaches would turning down top tier money while working for a proven SEC coach. Just seems like UT is still playing checkers while other programs are playing chess at every level of the administration.
The only reason we couldn't have considered him is because our administration and boosters are execrable and worthless and don't deserve to be running this proud football program that means a heck of a lot to millions of people, whom they are letting down in an unprecedented manner, month after month, year after year, with their reckless, wanton incompetence and arrogance.
I'm sure there are problems attached to him, but by all accounts he has turned his life around and can obviously still win. The point im making is...what baggage could be worse than letting the current admin dig us into a bigger hole for 3-4 years. We just hired a rb coach whose BEST offense he ever fielded was ranked 107th in the nation. His other offenses were 125th, 124th and 115th. Just don't see many recruits getting excited about that....or current players for that matter.
The board of trustees need to be involved in this just like they were with the Schiano debacle. If you want to stick your head in sand and believe that there is ANY chance this staff will EVER be able to compete with Florida, UGA, or Bama, then just stick your head in the sand and wait and see what the rest of us already know. Watch the recruiting rankings fall. Be prepared for 2-4 win seasons and watch the stadium be as empty as you have ever seen it for the next 3-4 years.Who will police this? What could anybody do to the administration to hold them accountable? Call them names?
Also, Is CJH a poor hire? You havent even given the guy a chance! Lord have mercy!
He has made it quiet clear that he wouldn't leave Liberty except for the right opportunity. No other program that has the resources of UT has performed this poorly.If he is such a football savior at such a bargain why are other marginal programs not cutting their HCs loose and making offers to him? The absolute absence of a market for him is telling and you cannot ignore it. Just for the record, what actual accounts are you referencing concerning him turning his life around? Could you link a couple? I am sure he has been very conservative in public, but that does not necessarily mean a change of heart more than it means he has learned how to cover up his inclinations.
There is a risk/reward ratio with every coach, and programs in our current situation have to minimize the risk. He and he alone is responsible for the ratio he currently has, not the programs in the market for a coach. It is particularly distressing that he took over a program under NCAA scrutiny following the Nutt fiasco, and doubled down with own actions to the point that the NCAA required wins by both coaches to be taken away. End of story.