JMSqb11
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 13, 2011
- Messages
- 17,550
- Likes
- 17,630
We're stuck on up and comers because nobody else wants to come here.
Dooley was hired at a very awkward spot in the calendar. Kiffin left after bowl season was over and about a month before signing day, and the coaches that we would have otherwise contacted had already gone around the coaching carousel. Nobody wanted the job. Butch was hired after several coaches, including Charlie Strong, said thanks but no thanks. Pruitt was hired after a completely disastrous coaching search that ended up in a job offer for one coach being pulled and the AD being fired.
This job just does not have the sheen that it used to. When it did have the sheen, we were able to attract a coach like Kiffin, who was a prominent figure on the coaching carousel that year.
I think money cures all things. The problem is we have never gone the money route where we throw 8-10 million per year at someone and make them say no.
I remember during the search I wished we offer that deal to Mullen and give him 2-3 hours to give us an answer so he couldn’t wait out Florida and Chip Kelly. As we have seen, Florida getting Mullen means we had to go elsewhere. Paying tons of money for a proven commodity while blocking your division rival is worth the money.
The problem right now is we can’t afford to dump Pruitt and make a homerun hire with a lot of money because of the budget shortfall and the fact Pruitt doesn’t have any offset language in his contract. We’d literally be asking booster to finance a 70-75 million dollar coaching change + budget shortfall (roughly 50 million). I find it inconceivable to ask for a 25 million dollar commitment to change coaches and not ask for another 50 million to make the department whole.