That's not true. When we fired Fulmer, we went out and hired Kiffin and went somewhat cheap. See his buyout for leaving as evidence.
With Dooley, we went thru many coaches until we found Dooley who would take Kiffin holdovers on staff. Additionally, we told Cut he couldn't bring the staff he wanted because some where coaches under Fulmer who Hamilton had fired a year earlier.
With Butch, we made strong offer to Charlie Strong only for him to mull it over instead of just offering 500K- 1 Million more to make him say yes. Given that Butch only lasted 5 years here, we should have just overpaid to get Strong here as he was better suited for the SEC and had a chip on his shoulder (UF and his marriage) against our rival. Tennessee was better suited for him than Texas. Regardless, he stayed at Louisville and we settled on Butch only after coming into fold late when he was about to take Colorado job.
The first time UT really forked up money during last decade beside buyouts was letting Butch get Bob Shoop and then Fulmer letting Pruitt hire and fire staff members to upgrade (See Chaney).
Tennessee has never gone into a coaching search where the coach they just fired had a buyout that wasn't on the AD's mind at the time of searching for a new coach.
We have never gone into a search post Fulmer Era where we ask first "Who is the best coach available" without adding "for a cheap budget"....... Tennessee's coaching staff should be one of the top paid staffs in the country with our financial infrastructure outside of Covid. However, we have booster factions and with infighting, it results in this cheap routes. Because why have booster infighting with big money coaching staffs?
Tennessee has never made a serious "top 15 job offer*" to any coach in a coaching search we've had. I'd argue that Mullen was prolly the most money we've offered a coach in some time, but still wasn't a "make them say no" offer.
*See screenshot below of top coaching salaries in College Football.
View attachment 326771