Somebody told me one time that with female softball players you can tell at a very early age, like 14 or so, whether or not they're going to be any good. The implication being that they really don't improve that much in the next few years. I don't know that I believe that, but I was told that so I offer it up for your consideration.
Here's my take on recruiting.
Short version - colleges are recruiting earlier and earlier. The biggest change I've seen in last 3-5 years is the emphasis on early recruiting. UT has 5 girls committed right now that are in 9th grade. Most coaches claim they "hate it" with regards to early verballing, but if they don't do it, others will so they are afraid of losing out. It's not as cut throat as football recruiting, or as drama filled.
Long version - Softball recruiting is a very different animal than the most talked about sport - football. In football HS performance matters. In softball, 99% of girls are recruited through their travel ball programs, and then through camps where the player and college coach can interact. Recruiting rules are pretty tight and the camp visit and unofficial visit is huge huge huge. In the summer and fall players participate in what are called showcases. These are tournaments attended by college coaches where they can watch a player in person. HS ball matters almost 0%. In fact, there are some coaches who don't mind if a recruit decides to run track, play tennis or do something else instead of play softball in HS.
The big thing with softball recruiting is the unwritten coaches code with a recruit. Once a recruit verbals to a school, other coaches will generally lay off that recruit. They might check in with their travel ball coach to see if they are still solidly committed to their original choice, but it's not like football where coaches are constantly trying to flip recruits. Top programs will verbal girls as young as 8th grade (rare), some 9th grade (not as rare) and by 10th grade most top recruits are verballed somewhere. A few might still be available in 11th grade, and even fewer in 12th. When I say top programs, I'm generally speaking about 20-25 teams - most of the SEC, PAC12, and the better teams in the Big 10, ACC and Big 12. Teams like Oklahoma, Michigan, FSU. Also, other programs will verbal girls early as well, mid-major types, but usually they'll only be a handful of their signing classes. Where at some of the top programs, early verbals will be a big chunk of their signing class. Out of UTs last few classes, I would be surprised if more than 75% of the signees weren't already verballed by 10th grade (excluding transfers). UT currently has 5 girls from the class of 2020 verballed. Those girls are in 9th grade right now. They have 9 2019s (10th graders). A lot of them have been verballed for at least a year, some more.
The crazy part is that most coaches "claim" to hate the early verbal trend. But, if they take the moral high ground and don't participate and wait until a player is a junior or senior in HS, by the time they are looking for top talent it's already committed. There is some pressure for the NCAA to do something about it, but who knows if it will go anywhere. Some people think that when top programs start whiffing on 13 and 14 year olds they will wise up. Others think it will only get worse. Ask 15 college coaches and travel ball head and you will get 15 different opinions.
How long have we heard about Ally Shipman coming to UT? Seems like forever. She's only a junior in HS. So it's a race to get the top young talent verballed. Also, like football, it's a juggling act with offering the right positions at the right time. You can't offer five shortstops a spot in the same class. Also, someone like a Caylon Arnold is rare. Her talent didn't emerge until late in HS. But once it did FSU, Washington, UT and others came pounding on the door. Late bloomers like this can be game changers. It takes special talent to start as a freshman in the SEC and not many of those girls are available past 10th grade.
Girls can sign their senior year of HS, and not a lot flip flop this late in the game to go to a competitor. If a girls verbals in 9th grade, sometimes they'll flip flop a year or two later, but rarely is it late in the game. It's usually low drama. Coaching changes can affect verbals, and I've seen a few players committed to schools that realized the academic standards were too much, so they will change schools for that reason. But it's unlike football where some of the top recruits make it all about them and put on a show with all the different hats, shirts, etc. One minute they are committed to UT, the next UGA, and then they sign with LSU. That doesn't happen in softball.
The challenge for a college coach when you recruit young talent is to not only recognize the talent at a young age, but make sure that talent keeps working to improve and doesn't think that since they verballed in 9th or 10th grade they can coast the rest of the way. And it is just a verbal, so coaches can pull it if they see some warning signs. It's rare, but it does happen. Also, grades and character are important. And softball is not a full scholarship sport so coaches will offer partials left and right. A lot of the top programs will offer partials to a lot of girls that exceed what they have available knowing there will be attrition. Every now and then a coach gets in a sticky situation where they over commit.
Yes, that was a lot. I actually had a 1/2 hour call with the head coach of a 14u team in a large organization last week about this very subject. He had a player get a verbal offer from an SEC school and is working with that SEC coach on a plan to make sure the girl keeps working hard and improving. She's a 2020. She's the 5th player to commit on that team. It's getting crazy!!!:crazy: