Gun control debate (merged)

I have to disagree, I think he actually believes his own BS.
People think I use hyperbole when saying he's a communist. While in many cases that may be true with others, not with him. I believe he's 100% communist and believe his end goal is total disarmament which has always been a precursor to communist take over. He 100% hates our freedoms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: newokie03 and hog88
I think he is. Too consistent with outlandish and/or vague statements that garner responses. I think it is very intentional trolling.
I have to disagree, I think he actually believes his own BS.
Quite the conundrum.

I do believe pretty much everything I say, but I say it in a way to generate responses and engage a "debate".
But really my only objective is to get you guys to reflect on your own thinking.....or non-thinking, whichever the case may be.

The bubble created here has a level of toxicity that is harming you guys in unseen ways. Just doing my part to help add a little occasional fresh air inside the bubble.

You're welcome.
 
No they wouldn’t. This is nonsense. They would be squashed like a bug.

The US Citizenry cannot stand against the US Military. And neither can “Canada”.

IOn some other terrain besides this country where the US military can unleash everything in its arsenal it’d be damn tough sledding. But that’s not the case; the US military with perhaps 300,000 personnel would be in our backyard and theirs, and have to cities and everyone in it to subjugate millions possibly tens of millions of citizens. Without regard to whether they are loyalist or rebel. It would have to be an indiscriminate slaughter.

It also discounts massive military/police defections and refusal to destroy their fellow citizen, brother, father, friend, and the vast pool of ex-military expertise already in the civilian pool. That’s all baked into the calculation of the 2A according to the records of statements and conversations left behind.
 
People think I use hyperbole when saying he's a communist. While in many cases that may be true with others, not with him. I believe he's 100% communist and believe his end goal is total disarmament which has always been a precursor to communist take over. He 100% hates our freedoms.
Well that's simply dumb. You need to think a little more deeply about your own thinking.
You may very well be as wrong about other things as you are about me.
 
IOn some other terrain besides this country where the US military can unleash everything in its arsenal it’d be damn tough sledding. But that’s not the case; the US military with perhaps 300,000 personnel would be in our backyard and theirs, and have to cities and everyone in it to subjugate millions possibly tens of millions of citizens. Without regard to whether they are loyalist or rebel. It would have to be an indiscriminate slaughter.

It also discounts massive military/police defections and refusal to destroy their fellow citizen, brother, father, friend, and the vast pool of ex-military expertise already in the civilian pool. That’s all baked into the calculation of the 2A according to the records of statements and conversations left behind.

It could be just simple sabotage war that would decimate the economy. The end of the dollar would be the end of DC with No pay. No soldiers. No police.

The ensuing chaos would make everyone a 2nd Believer. We already see the self imposed lawlessness, so why would any rational person want to give an inch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher
Oh stop it. Commonly used phrase today.

Not surprising though that you would resort to a favorite ploy of the Left.

Oh yes. Obama.
I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man.
 
I wonder how he feels about people who “know nothing about schools” weighing in on how to “fix them”.
Good point. There are actually people who post in the PF who believe that they have a clue about education and should be allowed input into educational matters just because they went to school, have a relative who teaches, or children in the school system. They obviously haven't the slightest school and need to leave it in the hands of those who do.
 
Last edited:
Good point. There are actually people who post in the PF who believe that just because they went to school, have a relative who teaches, or children in the school system they have a clue about education and should be allowed input into educational matters.
Given the actions of school systems over the past 3 years, they are of more sound mind than the people making decisions.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top