Gun control debate (merged)

You are over complicating this. It’s rather simple. Am armed US citizenry acts as a deterrent against authoritarianism. Given the recent surge of the executive branch exercising power that was never granted to them by the US constitution, I for one am thankful for the millions of Americans that exercise their right to bear arms. There is no telling how far our current Govt would be willing to go to infringe on all the rights our fellow countrymen died for if our populace had punted on fighting for and protecting the 2nd amendment.

An armed America scares you. It comforts me. And most on this board. The ones that think reasonably and rationally at least.
He's not over complicating it really. Him and the crew just don't have it in them to say what they want, and that's us disarmed.
 
I think I have it now.
If there was a conflict between the US government and the citizens, no country would come to the assistance of the citizens because the US military is so powerful they would obliterate those countries; however. the citizens could use the arms they had accumulated to defeat that same US military.

As proof of this line of reasoning the Revolutionary War is used. A war in which the citizens were armed, supplied, and assisted by France, Spain, and the Netherlands.

Now that's some sound logic.
If nothing else, you guys are good for a chuckle.

It’s far more logical than some extremely ignorant little person who knows absolutely nothing about what they attempt to argue about. If you don’t like the 2A amend the constitution. There is nothing to interpret. There is nothing to compromise. People have already conceded parts of their right which is always a perceived path for morons to think they can take a little more.
 
There is not a country in the world armed like us. Our gun nuts have it right and the rest of the world has it wrong?
You don't comprehend how idiotic that stance is.

We do a lot of things differently than the rest of the world. There’s a reason we’ve been the best country in the world for a long time. The more we get like the rest of the world, the worse off we are.
mid the rest of the world is so great the pick somewhere and go there. There’s no need to change the only standalone

you talking about comprehension in a thread where you’ve bragged about not knowing anything about the topic is laughable
 
Then what's the whole point about arming yourself? You can't have it both ways
I answered that for you the day prior. And I have said it before. I guess I will say it again.

The full weight of the US War Machine will roll over anything it chooses to roll over.

It’s not about stopping them from taking whatever ground they wanted. It’s about keeping them from holding it.

The armed US citizenry would become the largest guerrilla force in history, the insurgency fought on US soil the bloodiest.
 
We do a lot of things differently than the rest of the world. There’s a reason we’ve been the best country in the world for a long time. The more we get like the rest of the world, the worse off we are.
mid the rest of the world is so great the pick somewhere and go there. There’s no need to change the only standalone

you talking about comprehension in a thread where you’ve bragged about not knowing anything about the topic is laughable
But like all things liberal, it's not fair for the US to be better. So instead of the rest trying to be like the US it's only fair to lower our standards to match those of weaker nations. That way we can feel better.
 
We do a lot of things differently than the rest of the world. There’s a reason we’ve been the best country in the world for a long time. The more we get like the rest of the world, the worse off we are.
mid the rest of the world is so great the pick somewhere and go there. There’s no need to change the only standalone

you talking about comprehension in a thread where you’ve bragged about not knowing anything about the topic is laughable
The thread is not about guns, that's your miscomprehension once again.
The thread is about gun control.
I proudly claim to have limited knowledge about guns, especially compared to the gun nuts in the gun control thread.
But I have plenty to contribute on the actual topic of the thread, which again is GUN CONTROL....not guns.
And as I've stated multiple times, you guys confuse your obsessive and relatively meaningless knowledge of guns with wisdom.
And you guys have continued to prove the two are not the least bit correlated.

The US became the world leader of what all countries aspired to be because of our ability and willingness to recognize a wrong and work to correct it. Our willingness to change and progress.
The gun craziness in our country is the exact opposite of all the things that made us great. 65% of our nation and 95% of the world understands that.
 
The thread is not about guns, that's your miscomprehension once again.
The thread is about gun control.
I proudly claim to have limited knowledge about guns, especially compared to the gun nuts in the gun control thread.
But I have plenty to contribute on the actual topic of the thread, which again is GUN CONTROL....not guns.
And as I've stated multiple times, you guys confuse your obsessive and relatively meaningless knowledge of guns with wisdom.
And you guys have continued to prove the two are not the least bit correlated.

The US became the world leader of what all countries aspired to be because of our ability and willingness to recognize a wrong and work to correct it. Our willingness to change and progress.
The gun craziness in our country is the exact opposite of all the things that made us great. 65% of our nation and 95% of the world understands that.

I realize liberals such as yourself think they can be an authority on anything using their feels regardless of their knowledge on the subject but let me let you in on a little secret - it only makes you look stupid.
 
And it’s happened before - The American Revolution.

American guerrillas armed with the “AR-15” of the day - the Kentucky Long Rifle.
Armed by France, Spain, and the Netherlands.
Like I said, many countries would aid the side they viewed as correct.

Your scenario is simply an absurd impossibility......theoretically less likely than Godzilla landing on spacecraft and destroying Knoxville.
 
Armed by France, Spain, and the Netherlands.
Like I said, many countries would aid the side they viewed as correct.

Your scenario is simply an absurd impossibility......theoretically less likely than Godzilla landing on spacecraft and destroying Knoxville.
Who were already in open war with Britain.

Yes, you referenced zombies the other day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
I realize liberals such as yourself think they can be an authority on anything using their feels regardless of their knowledge on the subject but let me let you in on a little secret - it only makes you look stupid.
lol......there are plenty who look absolutely stupid in this debate, and unless you are one of those viewed as stupid by most, you know it ain't me.
 
You could if it was ironic. but it's not. Speaking of ignorance.........

Yes, yes I’m sure you’re right, but there must be a term for a person, admitting others have more technical knowledge – that is accurate knowledge – who then goes on to childishly label them “clearly as gun nuts with small pee pees” while oblivious to painting themself with their own infantile brush.

Hmm, what is that term, or was that your intended outcome?
 
Who were already in open war with Britain.

Yes, you referenced zombies the other day.
And yet you believe, that our government could become so horrible and dangerous that its citizens would pick up arms against it and other countries wouldn't jump at the chance to assist those citizens.
That is an absurd and indefensible position. Simply could not and would not ever happen.

The gun nuts whole Rambo, cowboy vs. Indians, true patriot, guerilla war games pretending is simply laughable.

A big dose of 21st century reality would go a long way for some of you guys stuck with a child's view from the 1950's.
 
And yet you believe, that our government could become so horrible and dangerous that its citizens would pick up arms against it and other countries wouldn't jump at the chance to assist those citizens.
That is an absurd and indefensible position. Simply could not and would not ever happen.

The gun nuts whole Rambo, cowboy vs. Indians, true patriot, guerilla war games pretending is simply laughable.

A big dose of 21st century reality would go a long way for some of you guys stuck with a child's view from the 1950's.
Lol, you just channeled your boy Obama.
 
Yes, yes I’m sure you’re right, but there must be a term for a person, admitting others have more technical knowledge – that is accurate knowledge – who then goes on to childishly label them “clearly as gun nuts with small pee pees” while oblivious to painting themself with their own infantile brush.

Hmm, what is that term, or was that your intended outcome?
I find it odd that you went straight to the small pee pee interpretation of "compensating". I never thought that would account for more than maybe 20% of the gun nuts' need for "compensating".
 
It would depend on the circumstances and who had "control" of the US government.
Some countries would support the Trumpian side (North Korea, Russia, Saudi Arabia.)
Some countries would support the anti-Trump side (England, Japan, Canada, France, Germany, Mexico)

I think the hope for help strategy was discarded as a result of our own revolution. And resulted in the 2A. The most likely scenario is that Europe and other countries would take a neutral stance just as they did during the Civil War. Or, as other western countries become more authoritarian, recognize the US as the last Western bastion of classical liberalism, and enter on the side of the despotic US government being fought. Again, thus the 2A not allowing our government a monopoly of force.
 
lol......there are plenty who look absolutely stupid in this debate, and unless you are one of those viewed as stupid by most, you know it ain't me.
Lol, when you set aside sound logic and statistical data, your arguments make sense. Otherwise they're a steaming, smelly pile of excrement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher
No idea who you are referring to saying "always the fall back", it's not me.
I posted it because it's true, it doesn't apply to everyone but it does to you.

Then you missed spoke by stating “clearly all compensating for something”, or you’re misspeaking now?
 
Advertisement





Back
Top