So let's look at the "facts" of this so called lawsuit...
Families of Newtown victims sue gunmaker, seller
The lawsuit contends that the AR-15 rifle Lanza used in his attack was designed to be a military weapon, had "little utility" for civil purposes and thus should not have been in Lanza's hands.
First, the Bushmaster AR-15 was not designed as a "military weapon." The AR-15 specifically used does comply with all federal regulations set forth under the National Firearms Act of 1934 as well as the Gun Control Act of 1968.
Secondly, Lanza killed his mother and took the weapon, unlawfully mind you, from the safe to commit the act. So he committed a criminal act to obtain said weapon in the first place. Which violates this portion of 15 USC SS 7901:
(1) To prohibit causes of action against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and importers of firearms or ammunition products, and their trade associations, for the harm solely caused by the criminal or unlawful misuse of firearm products or ammunition products by others when the product functioned as designed and intended.
So the basis of "facts" for suing Bushmaster and the dealer are bunk. Pure bunk. Lanza obtained the weapon illegally and wasn't even the one who purchased it. Secondly, the AR-15 model that Bushmaster produces is in no way, shape or form a military class weapon (don't even get me started on the TDP specs they violate) and is entirely legal to own in it's semi-automatic form.
And while we're on the subject of general stupidity, why go after Bushmaster and the dealer? Unless Lanza clubbed a few of the victims to death, the ammunition manufacturer is just as much or more at fault than the weapon manufacturer. Because without ammo, that weapon is nothing more than aluminum, plastic and steel. How about the magazine manufacturer as well?
This will get tossed, the families will be out a lot of money and there will still be zero rectification in the process.