Gun control debate (merged)

This guy took a gun, converted it, then drove 3.5 hours to kill some black people. One of four mass shootings this weekend. You guys refusing to acknowledge there's a gun problem in this country are increasingly just plain ridiculous.

Your refusal to address the problem and instead blaming a tool is absolutely maddening. Especially as the strictest gun control laws didn’t even come close to preventing it. I’m fact the places with the strictest laws have the biggest problem.
Look in your mirror for ridiculous
 
That’s terrible.

Now for the good news. Regardless of the number of shootings between now and November the leftists in DC won’t do anything about gun laws because they’re already on the losing side of so many issues. They’ll flap their gums and flail their arms and run around with their hair ion fire but they won’t do squat.
Unfortunately true.
 
This guy took a gun, converted it, then drove 3.5 hours to kill some black people. One of four mass shootings this weekend. You guys refusing to acknowledge there's a gun problem in this country are increasingly just plain ridiculous.

Tell us again what gun converted itself and drove 3.5 hours to kill people .
 
This guy took a gun, converted it, then drove 3.5 hours to kill some black people. One of four mass shootings this weekend. You guys refusing to acknowledge there's a gun problem in this country are increasingly just plain ridiculous.
Read the bolded out loud to yourself five times while staring into a mirror and maybe you can understand that crazy ass behavior has nothing to do with the gun. Lulz.
 
Read the bolded out loud to yourself five times while staring into a mirror and maybe you can understand that crazy ass behavior has nothing to do with the gun. Lulz.
He wanted the weapon he could easily get his hands on that would do the most damage.
Pretty simple concept.
Had he been able to easily get his hands on a bunch of grenades, he would have.
 
He wanted the weapon he could easily get his hands on that would do the most damage.
Pretty simple concept.
Had he been able to easily get his hands on a bunch of grenades, he would have.
I’m guessing you think you proved something with this?

Congrats. You just stated that someone who wants to kill will find the implement they want to kill with. That is the individual’s problem not the implement’s fault.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mr.checkerboards
I’m guessing you think you proved something with this?

Congrats. You just stated that someone who wants to kill will find the implement they want to kill with. That is the individual’s problem not the implement’s fault.
Shocked you completely, maybe intentionally, misunderstood.
The most destructive weapon that is easily available will be the weapon of choice. Take that where you wish to go with it.
 
Shocked you completely, maybe intentionally, misunderstood.
The most destructive weapon that is easily available will be the weapon of choice. Take that where you wish to go with it.
Hilarious that you stepped in it and are now trying to feint away from your stupidity. Welcome to enlightenment in understanding the killer will kill and will obtain the desired means to do so. Now time for your next attempt to pull your foot out of your mouth.
 
Hilarious that you stepped in it and are now trying to feint away from your stupidity. Welcome to enlightenment in understanding the killer will kill and will obtain the desired means to do so. Now time for your next attempt to pull your foot out of your mouth.
It is hilarious; but it's not a foot in my mouth, it's a short in your brain.
I said exactly what I wanted to say the first time and also in my attempt to bring it down to a level you would understand.

Your stance is so simplistic I'm a little embarrassed for you, I know - shocker.
What he really wanted was a short range missile but he couldn't come up with one, so then he thought tank but struck out again.
He didn't get what he wanted; he got what he could.
 
This guy took a gun, converted it, then drove 3.5 hours to kill some black people. One of four mass shootings this weekend. You guys refusing to acknowledge there's a gun problem in this country are increasingly just plain ridiculous.

How far did the dude in Wisconsin drive to run over some white people?
 
It is hilarious; but it's not a foot in my mouth, it's a short in your brain.
I said exactly what I wanted to say the first time and also in my attempt to bring it down to a level you would understand.

Your stance is so simplistic I'm a little embarrassed for you, I know - shocker.
What he really wanted was a short range missile but he couldn't come up with one, so then he thought tank but struck out again.
He didn't get what he wanted; he got what he could.
There is nothing put forth yet stating he wanted a grenade launcher but had to settle on the firearms he used. That’s just your empty assertion as usual. You just wedged the foot in a little tighter. 🤡
 
Good place for this story.
A couple of weeks ago we got a package delivered (pretty much a daily occurrence) that contained a silencer. The mailing label had our address and my wife's name, but the invoice in the box was for a gun shop in a county north of here. My wife called the shop and they acted like she was crazy. Monday an ATF agent contacted my wife and set up a time to come by and pick up the silencer. Once the gun shop got my wife's package, they realized what she had been trying to tell them and they contacted ATF. The agent got a big kick out of the whole mix-up (mailing labels mixed up at the distribution warehouse.) He said "if you think you were shocked when you opened the box and saw a silencer, think of how the guy at the gun shop felt when he opened your box and found skin cream."
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland
There is nothing put forth yet stating he wanted a grenade launcher but had to settle on the firearms he used. That’s just your empty assertion as usual. You just wedged the foot in a little tighter. 🤡
That's okay, don't beat yourself up, thinking's hard.
 
When ever I see liberals talking about gun control, I can't help but think of this....

cans-the.gif
 
I’m not the one playing multiple instances of made up BS as fact and having them thrown back in my face while I’m truly to dislodge my foot from my mouth.
Maybe try eating more fish.
ND - psycho mass killers get the weapon they want.
Luther - psycho mass killers want the most deadly weapon they can get.

Grilled tuna is good.
 
Maybe try eating more fish.
ND - psycho mass killers get the weapon they want.
Luther - psycho mass killers want the most deadly weapon they can get.

Grilled tuna is good.
It’s gotta be hard to bob and weave while pulling on your foot wedged so tightly in your mouth. But you’ve also had a lot of practice at it too!
 
Would you agree that there is a difference, although both events are horrific, between 10 dead in one case and none dead in the other? Quit trying to make this about whites not getting treated as well. That's just not the case. Sandy Hook was overwhelmingly white and it got plenty of coverage.

Seeing there is another mass shooting in Texas today. I thought the whole idea of allowing free carry of firearms was that the good guys would stop the bad guys. Only time I've seen that was a church shooting in Texas.
I literally said that it was good that none got killed from the woman shooting up the bus. There's no difference to me in any shooting, I'm asking why nobody on the left ever posts a single time when it's not a white shooter. There's literally mass shootings in Chicago and Atlanta every week, and none of you blink an eye about it. Also, the problem with your theory, all the shootings you guys do talk about happen in gun free zones. How's the good guy supposed to have a chance?
 
He wanted the weapon he could easily get his hands on that would do the most damage.
Pretty simple concept.
Had he been able to easily get his hands on a bunch of grenades, he would have.
He also said he went to a place where he knew he had the least likely chance of confronting someone with a gun.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top