Gun control debate (merged)

It's LG. I was actually waiting on him to link this. Expect more from him?

You have to admit the irony. Seriously hope she survives, but lady with Facebook pages touting gun ownership, including posting about her 4 year old shooting, then gets shot by the 4 year old?

You can't make that up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Background checks for all sales, including private non-commercial sales, insurance on firearms, tort reform that allows manufacturer and citizens who lose their firearms to be sued.

Yep, that's real "sensible."

And there lies the problem with your stance on the matter.
 
Background checks for all sales, including private non-commercial sales, insurance on firearms, tort reform that allows manufacturer and citizens who lose their firearms to be sued.

How would any of those provisions prevented her from being shot?

And please explain how allowing manufacturers to be sued will stop the illegal or irresponsible use of firearms?
 
How would any of those provisions prevented her from being shot?

And please explain how allowing manufacturers to be sued will stop the illegal or irresponsible use of firearms?

I suspect that LG is a civil lawyer. He just wants to make more money.
 
How would any of those provisions prevented her from being shot?

And please explain how allowing manufacturers to be sued will stop the illegal or irresponsible use of firearms?

He wants the manufacturers run out of business and his method of choice is......wait for it.............SUE THIER ARSE!!!!!!!
 
How would any of those provisions prevented her from being shot?

And please explain how allowing manufacturers to be sued will stop the illegal or irresponsible use of firearms?

If she had insurance for this that would pay the six figure medical bills, instead we will pay for it through higher health insurance.

She chose to have a gun. She should pay for the expenses caused by that decision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

Advertisement



Back
Top