Fulmer writes response to Adams Article

After all this time, you finally post something that is accurate. Sad it was a mere parenthetical in an otherwise typically wothless post, but better than normal.
If you want to put me on iggy too, that ok with me.:eek:k:

What is it with you? Napoleon's complex? Penis envy?
 
After reading through 9 pages I really just need one thing cleared up.

Does dickens think Adams is a hack?
 
THis is so predictable and boring. Please either stay on topic or take it to PMs.
 
What's a hack?

duggan_hacksaw.jpg
 
Damn i missed a good rant. I don't know about you guys. But no new news in that letter there. Kinda sounded like what you typically hear out of phil. He had to respond about it. It was a attack on him personally.
 
Like I said, good show my man. Good show.:thumbsup:
Thank you. While I consider Fulmer to be about as appealing as a skunk at a picnic, it's amazing how easy Adams has it. Take unrelated or tangential facts, use them to draw an innuendo that gores a sacred cow, then watch the unwashed masses froth at the mouth. The columns must just write themselves.
 
I agree Fulmer should not have responded. Adams is just a reporter for a small media outlet.Who even reads his articles except the Knox County community. Wow! I agree with Fulmer, "Limited Perspective".
 
Thank you. While I consider Fulmer to be about as appealing as a skunk at a picnic, it's amazing how easy Adams has it. Take unrelated or tangential facts, use them to draw an innuendo that gores a sacred cow, then watch the unwashed masses froth at the mouth. The columns must just write themselves.
Its a hack's paradise:lolabove:
 
Every big university town has at least 1 no talent, low paid media hack whose sole purpose to get readers and create interest is to dish up dirt on the local team. Adams---he's the hack--no talent, low paid, probably bitter at sitting in some cubicle every day jealous of money the Fulmer makes.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top