Or like when you said UT would get half of USC's punishments.Sorta like when I said an investigation into Cam's recruitment would lead to our name coming up, right? Or sorta like when I said Reaves directed the hostesses, right? Or sorta like when I said Kiffin would get cited by the NCAA for a major violation during his Tennessee tenure, right?
Sorta like when I said an investigation into Cam's recruitment would lead to our name coming up, right? Or sorta like when I said Reaves directed the hostesses, right? Or sorta like when I said Kiffin would get cited by the NCAA for a major violation during his Tennessee tenure, right?
Keep digging Vegas
Also, from posts on this site, from several of the most reliable recruiting information posters, we had offered him.
Newton failed big time when he visited with our previous staff. Had difficulty understanding alignments...
Right or wrong, Kif didn't believe Cam could execute his offense and he wasn't interested in changing it.
I suppose we had a 153 page thread on Newton in the recruiting section because we had no interest, right?
Just a few of the snapshots from some of the more reliable posters...
"I've heard we offered him.. don't have a second confirmation on that though..."
"Hey Sab are we after Newton?"
"We are pursuing him and are in good shape."
From Tennessee news sources:
Tennessee is probably recruiting me the hardest right now, Newton explained. I watched their game with Florida this weekend. If they had got any big plays on offense they would have won that game.
Apparently the feelings are mutual between Tennessee and Newton.
I have a lot of interest in Tennessee, Newton said. They will definitely get one of my official visits.
According to Blinn Head Coach Brad Franchione, Tennessee has been recruiting Newton for a while.
They came in late spring and their interest seems to be building, Franchione said. Tennessee definitely has a lot of interest in Cameron.
Where does Tennessee stand currently for Newton?
They are definitely one of my top schools, Newton said. Looking at Tennessees depth chart and see how much young talent they have, the future is definitely bright in Knoxville.
also from another search on a poster who is very credible on any UT site
no one's arguing that he wasn't pursued but there was no offer and we didn't stop recruiting him just because we got outbid.
So basically what you're saying is that Lane Kiffin is one of the worst talent evaluators in the history of QB talent evaluation -- that he actually thought Simms was more talented than Newton. Uh-huh....
So basically what you're saying is that Lane Kiffin is one of the worst talent evaluators in the history of QB talent evaluation -- that he actually thought Simms was more talented than Newton. Uh-huh....
No, what I'm saying is simply a fact. Simms was offered and Newton wasn't.
I realize the truth is hard for you to accept.
We disagree as to why. Possibilities include:
1) We lost out in the Newton pay-for-play "sweepstakes" (after all, many of the posters on this site, claim it's "obvious" Auburn is "guilty" and "must have" paid Newton to get him to commit there);
2) We got cold feet when the NCAA came sniffing around in the early fall of 2009;
3) We decided Matt Simms was so much better than Newton that Simms deserved an offer and Newton didn't.
I consider #2 the most plausible of the 3.
We disagree as to why. Possibilities include:
1) We lost out in the Newton pay-for-play "sweepstakes" (after all, many of the posters on this site, claim it's "obvious" Auburn is "guilty" and "must have" paid Newton to get him to commit there);
2) We got cold feet when the NCAA came sniffing around in the early fall of 2009;
3) We decided Matt Simms was so much better than Newton that Simms deserved an offer and Newton didn't.
I consider #2 the most plausible of the 3.
We disagree as to why. Possibilities include:
1) We lost out in the Newton pay-for-play "sweepstakes" (after all, many of the posters on this site, claim it's "obvious" Auburn is "guilty" and "must have" paid Newton to get him to commit there);
2) We got cold feet when the NCAA came sniffing around in the early fall of 2009;
3) We decided Matt Simms was so much better than Newton that Simms deserved an offer and Newton didn't.
I consider #2 the most plausible of the 3.
