I've already adressed much of this in subsequent comments. In the OP i stated even if only a portion of this is correct it is troubling. Roger's testimony is perhaps the most troubling because you have a 38 year veteran of UT who is pleading with his superiors to address situations and gets to the point where he "retires."
Sure, there are subjects like the Lil Jon thing that aren't in and of themselves any problem, but the plantiffs are pointing towards a culture issue. I know that the issue of using a Lil jon song did raise concerns and was mentioned in the media and had nothing to do with this case. The teams response was to ignore these concerns and not only to keep using his material, but to welcome him onto campus as some VIP. Hey, you write songs that are derogatory towards women, no problem, we'll celebrate you here! Not real intelligient if you ask me. The guy is referred to as having the most misogynistic lyrics out there.
As far as the issues addressed that were non sexual, i think they are simply painting a picture that UT would go to unusual lengths to keep its atheletes eligible. The majority of the suit deals with recent issues and plantiffs.
There is a larger narrative here. Whether it's Jamis Winston, or Cam Newton, college football is corrupt. Everyone does it? Don't care. I don't have to support this nonsense, and i won't.
