He hasn't and it's the primary reason he has never been a head coach again. The OP is grasping at straws for any outside opinion that supports the notion that Pruitt deserves more time. When Pruitt isn't hired again as head coach for a long, long time following his experiment at UT, it still won't register in their minds that he was a terrible hire in the first place. It's the same reason Dooley has never been a head coach again and the only reason Jones was rehired is because AD's believe that Saban's mystique will somehow rub off on his assistant coaches. If time were the answers to those two disasters, then they would have been rehired immediately after leaving UT. Giving a coach more time doesn't magically make them better just like practicing the same flawed golf swing over and over doesn't make you a better golfer. If we could point to areas of strengths for Pruitt that have really improved the team, then there would be some logic behind the more time argument, but outside of a handful of players on defense and Eric Gray, there has been little to no measurable improvement and this year's recruiting class will put to bed the fallacy that he is an elite recruiter.