jakez4ut
Patience... It's what's for dinner
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2005
- Messages
- 72,528
- Likes
- 133,060
i'm not big on fulmer either, but today, i think if he's not the guy standing at that podium....we're just done.Agreed. Im not big on Fulmer in the role either, but Sigmon is another disaster waiting to happen.
Should have been Blackburn from the start.
as do we all.I doubt he was there. I just worry about how much influence he has over the decision making.
Currie was anti Haslam, Fulmer is pro Haslam. Haslam won. We are officially in the ice age of UT Football, time to pack it up.
i'm not big on fulmer either, but today, i think if he's not the guy standing at that podium....we're just done.
I agree. If it's Fulmer, the Anti-Haslam faction has won. If not, the HoH has either reasserted control or an uneasy truce has settled in.
Either way, if it's not Fulmer, I worry about our future. Not so much in that I believe he is the Be all end all, but just from an indication of what's happening.
How is Currie anti-haslam? He literally didnt even search for a coach, he just tried to hire the guy that Haslam spoon fed him( schiano). Please explain how haslam's puppet is ot a haslam guy?
There both pro haslum. They were anti each other. Now fulmer got Currie out of his way he will do Haslums bidding just like Currie did. Difference is Currie knew the search was blown and better take who he could get that is all that was ever working in our favor. Phil will take a step back and find a candidate we hate.