SpaceCoastVol
Jacked up on moonshine and testosterone
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 56,171
- Likes
- 70,320
People like Colonel Paul Tibbetts could be construed as a mass murderer as well.
I've read the book and at no time in the book did he claim to kill innocents, brag about it or state any male 15-55 was fair game.
This won't be popular but:
As far as I'm concerned, (the ole saying)
If you can't back our soldiers, I suggest you pick up a rifle and stand in front of them.
I can't judge this man or ones like him/her for his/her decisions. I've never walked in his/her shoes.
This won't be popular but:
As far as I'm concerned, (the ole saying)
If you can't back our soldiers, I suggest you pick up a rifle and stand in front of them.
I can't judge this man or ones like him/her for his/her decisions. I've never walked in his/her shoes.
This is a good example of the hero worship that makes some of us scratch our heads. You can support the troops and respect their position without treating them like minor deities and pretending they are above reproach. And the whole attitude that you've displayed regarding those of us who don't feel the same way is insulting and dishonest.
Let's say an American soldier is found to have indiscriminately killed a village full of innocents, men women and children. A senseless act of violence and murder. Then that soldier is on record bragging about his accomplishment. You think in this scenario, that man shouldn't be criticized? And no, I'm not saying this is what Kyle did. It's a thought exercise to determine what an American soldier has to do in your eyes to deserve criticism, if that's even possible from your mindset.
This is a good example of the hero worship that makes some of us scratch our heads. You can support the troops and respect their position without treating them like minor deities and pretending they are above reproach. And the whole attitude that you've displayed regarding those of us who don't feel the same way is insulting and dishonest.
Let's say an American soldier is found to have indiscriminately killed a village full of innocents, men women and children. A senseless act of violence and murder. Then that soldier is on record bragging about his accomplishment. You think in this scenario, that man shouldn't be criticized? And no, I'm not saying this is what Kyle did. It's a thought exercise to determine what an American soldier has to do in your eyes to deserve criticism, if that's even possible from your mindset.
Good thing I said in that very post I wasn't saying that was what Kyle did, I was creating a scenario out of thin air.
Yes. Now what?
What people don't seem to understand is that if both sides behave in ruthless ways, it's going to make it harder for the other side to back down.
I think if we fight fair (my suggestion is Marque and Reprisal, like the constitution suggests) then we are less likely to create more/new terrorists. Killing innocents is hurting our popularity among fence-sitters.
Acting differently? I haven't heard that US personnel had begun using tactics such as kidnapping, rape and absolute torture of innocents in any situation to have intel and/or access to the enemy.
