utmba93
Time for a New Era
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2007
- Messages
- 15,898
- Likes
- 98
We fired our staff after the season you think describes UT football. It's NOT horseshoes. Close does NOT count.
No Tinker Bell claims have been made. There's nothing false about saying the SEC champ has been the NC for the past three seasons. It's stating a FACT. NO magic!
This is the only UT stat you have acknowledged. It's shows so much bias. If you're going to post here, why don't you learn something more about UT football? Last season, in no way, defines our tradition.
It's your only sense of history beyond last season. Your grandfather played for the Ducks at some point. If that is true (taking your word as no support has been provided), what we know for a fact, is that his team did NOT win a NC.
Btw... I have nothing against Oregon. They're just not on UT's level in my heart.
Well according to your philosophy Bowling Green is better since the most recent measure of performance for them was better than UT.We've been over this. It defines the most recent measure of performance for the team. Thus, it is very relevant toward evaluating how good they are.
Huh? The staff was fired because they were the opposite of close.
UT was 'close' to winning the SEC in 2007. We finished the season 10-4. It wasn't enough. In 2007, you think the Ducks were 'close' to 'winning the NC,' yet they finished 9-4 (I know you think DD would have carried the day for you)? Would the Ducks have beaten LSU that year. I don't think DD was good enough for you to keep suggesting that outcome as they had a defense unlike any you faced. Yet, the Vols played literally played 'close' to the Tigers that season (pick 6 difference) while you keep bragging about how the Ducks could have played close if they had the chance and Dixon was healthy.... and add Tinker Bell to your argument about here... .
That fact is only relevant to this discussion if you're implying that it means the next champ will be from the SEC. The SEC has had a good run. But, programs change and different teams can win. That's why we watch the games.
I'm not talking about the 'next champ' as we are considering three seasons before Brown would go pro right? I'm saying that if you insist on using the most recent history (e.g. you keep arguing about last year and next year and put blinders on everything else), then last year the SEC won the NC (as they have done for the past three seasons). I assume Brown would play more than one year as his only option would be the CFL again (or transferring out of Oregon, if he made that mistake). He has to play three before going to the NFL. During those three, UT will rebuild. It may not be this fall, but we'll be respectable and we'll get better. It's over that period of time that I think UT's odds of winning a NC are certainly as good as Oregon's chances. We have better talent and better coaching and we play in the better league.
Is Wyoming in the SEC? UCLA?
Again, this is the only season you know. Read more. Learn the way of the Vols.
We've been over this. It defines the most recent measure of performance for the team. Thus, it is very relevant toward evaluating how good they are.
Do you think coaching plays any role whatsoever in college football?
Hah! Believe it or not.
Oh... I believe your grandfather played for an Oregon team that did NOT win the NC. No Oregon team ever has. The only part I have to accept is that someone played on a team that failed to win a championship. That's not as hard to believe as you might suspect.
fyp
Don't be so sure about who is the Homer in your claim that Oregon's football program has UT's accomplishments.
UT 6-time National Champion
Oregon played for over 100 years and still has not won one.
You should punt on this one, Duck.
Well according to your philosophy Bowling Green is better since the most recent measure of performance for them was better than UT.
And since you think Bowling Green is better than UT, well then, I don't really know what to think about you.
Edit: I guess Bowling Green did beat Wyoming at Wyoming. Didn't see that one coming when I picked BG out of a hat.![]()
comments in Orange...
You do not fit here either.I didn't say that last seasons record is the end-all decider of who is better. It's just substantial evidence. Other factors could be at play as well.
Just the opposite, I've pointed out that about 95% of those accomplishments don't mean a thing toward the subject of where Brown fits best.
lol
I'd buy you a drink if I could (and if you are old enough to have it).
why are you on this board? you have terrible arguements and NOBODY wants you here. Doesn't Oregon have their own forums you can post on? Or at least have the courtesy to start a "UT vs. OU" thread and get out of bryce brown's recruiting thread.
I already explained "why I am here."
I was looking for info on the Brown visit. Saw some Oregon bashing and was inspired to respond.
I already explained "why I am here."
I was looking for info on the Brown visit. Saw some Oregon bashing and was inspired to respond.
I don't think it should seem mysterious in a discussion forum that, if people start responding to me directly, I will also answer?
I think my post count got over 300 on the Buckeyes board last year, discussing the Terrelle Pryor saga.![]()
Are you kin to Droski. Go read his threads and posts to see how to conduct yourself when visiting another board. It should be noted that even though he is a California Fan he is respected by Volnation. You can start an Oregon Thread in Volnation and get all the argument about Brown and the game you desire.
You have said what you need to say about BB so let it go and move on.
ITS ANOTHER TEAMS BOARD. what are you expecting to see? "Oh i am sure brown will go to Oregon because they are amazing and the best fit for him and just the best team in the world!" Your looking for an arguement. If you just wanted information, you wouldn't be posting.
Well you just validated that you are an idiot and would not let that one go either. You are close to being banned.
