#BoycottNRA

How is it enforced?

If a gun that is on record as belonging to person A is used in the commission of a crime, then person A is liable (within reason and dependent of the circumstances.)

People would be encouraged to follow the law in order to protect themselves.
 
If a gun that is on record as belonging to person A is used in the commission of a crime, then person A is liable (within reason and dependent of the circumstances.)

People would be encouraged to follow the law in order to protect themselves.

So there basically is no realistic enforcement (duh), and you want to punish person A for the actions of a person B, assuming person B went onto commit a crime with a gun that person A sold them.
 
So there basically is no realistic enforcement (duh), and you want to punish person A for the actions of a person B, assuming person B went onto commit a crime with a gun that person A sold them.

Person A would have absolutely no liability if he followed the laws governing the sale of the firearm.
 
Sure I do:

Type: Any that fires more than x rounds per y seconds

Number: Can purchase no more than x guns per y months

Plus: Close all gun show, private and internet sales loopholes.

Yep, I was right.

Love ya Luther
 
So there basically is no realistic enforcement (duh), and you want to punish person A for the actions of a person B, assuming person B went onto commit a crime with a gun that person A sold them.

I think we should do the same with car sales.
You sell to somebody that can't drive responsibly, your ____ is on the hook.
 
If a gun that is on record as belonging to person A is used in the commission of a crime, then person A is liable (within reason and dependent of the circumstances.)

People would be encouraged to follow the law in order to protect themselves.

I'm pretty sure people just wanted to commit you to stating a registry would be required...which you have.
 
Sure I do:

Type: Any that fires more than x rounds per y seconds

Number: Can purchase no more than x guns per y months

Plus: Close all gun show, private and internet sales loopholes.

Nothing in this post has any legal standing or defining terminology. So I guess we’re fine here! Back to Russia Collusion now.
 
Nothing in this post has any legal standing or defining terminology. So I guess we’re fine here! Back to Russia Collusion now.

Remember back when "we" wanted to ban all guns?

Let's keep throwing stuff at it that doesn't work. "We"'ll come full circle soon enough.
 
If a gun that is on record as belonging to person A is used in the commission of a crime, then person A is liable (within reason and dependent of the circumstances.)

People would be encouraged to follow the law in order to protect themselves.
I think I can speak for all people that would be victims of a crime that would then be prosecuted under your law when I say **** you and the horse you rode in on.
 
I think I can speak for all people that would be victims of a crime that would then be prosecuted under your law when I say **** you and the horse you rode in on.

I wonder if guy L sold a car to guy A and guy a went to a bar and got drunk. Guy A leaves bar in the car that guy L sold him and wrecks and kills guy B and his family. I guess in Luther's world guy L is liable for the dui crash of guy A.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I wonder if guy L sold a car to guy A and guy a went to a bar and got drunk. Guy A leaves bar in the car that guy L sold him and wrecks and kills guy B and his family. I guess in Luther's world guy L is liable for the dui crash of guy A.

You guys are absolute morons. Guy A has no liability if he sells his gun and the gun is then used in a crime, IF guy A follows the law when selling the gun. Go back and reread the previous sentence, slowly....a couple of times.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top