I watched the McDonald’s All-American Game closely, and I wanted to share my take on Big O.
First, as other posters have stated, the game is a showcase. Players are out to impress individually, and not necessarily to run a well-rehearsed system. So judging “team play” or passing etc isn’t always fair. The game is notoriously hard for bigs for this reason. Many guards were isolation-heavy, which is expected in this setting. Jerzy Robinson, the SC recruit who started with O, was pressing a bit and hunting her shot which doesn't lead to great inclusion of interior or other players. Edwards, as a versatile big, stood out IMO: she was active on the floor, involved in rebounds, finished a couple at the rim, and even flirted with a double-double. That she also participated in the dunk contest and won the 1v1 skills competition, highlights both her athleticism and her ability to create her own shot. No, she won't be playing 1 on 1 here, but Kim's system puts players in situations where they need to create and players at O's size who can do that, as well as the "traditional" big things, are better fits in the more positionless like scheme than your back to the basket, lower mobility posts. She had the best showing for bigs in this outing but to get a better look at her, it might be beneficial to look at additional clips from her standard games in a traditional system. Just my two.
What impressed me most is her combination of versatility and raw athleticism. Our system relies on bigs who can finish around the rim, create in isolation, and defend multiple areas which are all things she showed glimpses of, even in a one-off all-star game. She arrived late to basketball, so her ceiling is high; with college-level training, a strength program, and structured competition, I think she grows into an even bigger asset. She's competitive and encourages the spotlight, not getting too up or too down by external noise, which will be of benefit in this setting in particular. She is less likely to cower under the bright lights and intense program scrutiny.
In my perspective: she was energetic, engaged, and a clear athletic standout. She’ll be a valuable piece in our system, and we’re lucky to have her. Constructive criticism of course is fine but I also strongly believe in keeping it constructive vs toxic before they've even stepped on campus and, bottom line, giving young players the space and benefit of a chance to develop.