Yeah, it'll never be a perfectly tit for tat comparison.
"Perfect," Doberman?
We're not talking 99% good versus 100% good, here.
We're talking a roster stocked with future NFL talent versus a roster completely devoid of that level of talent.
There is simply no valid comparison of the two starting points. None. Completely different situations.
So compare them 2016 to 2016, current year to current year, or not at all. That's the only objective way.
Yep, KB, because Michigan wasn't broke the way Tennessee was broke. Not in talent on board, not in relationships with the high school coaches they needed to recruit from, not in relationships with boosters, or with alumni, former coaches, the community, none of that.
Harbaugh may have started below par at Michigan, but Butch had to start below sea level.
That's why I like comparing where they are today...because if you compare them both from their own starting lines, they're at totally different places.
i'll buy that. while also saying i think Butch has proven that he's a solid recruiter at the same time, and that he was on Kelly's staff, he probably at least played a part in bringing those kids in to CMU and CIN. so it's not quite apples/apples to what he walked in to here, i get what you're saying.
In his second year as head coach, Jim Harbaugh had 11 players drafted. In a single draft. Those aren't guys he recruited; that's the situation he inherited.
How many did Butch have drafted after his second season? What did Butch inherit?
There's simply no comparison between the two starting points.
If you ignore all the other massive differences in situation between Michigan at Harbaugh's arrival and Tennessee at Jones', you should at least carefully consider that.
The point of contention here is that there isn't 51 coaches better than Butch Jones. If you believe that then you're wrong. I'm sorry. If you've been following closely this whole time and you're still not seeing it then you're a lost cause.
The point of contention here is that there isn't 51 coaches better than Butch Jones. If you believe that then you're wrong. I'm sorry. If you've been following closely this whole time and you're still not seeing it then you're a lost cause.
I don't know where I'd rank him. On it's face, 52 does seem a bit low.
I guess I'd ask this question: of the 65 Power 5 teams (and ND), how many would trade their current coach for Butch Jones? I definitely don't think you'd get any takers in the SEC.
That's my point exactly for starting the thread. Even if you think Butch is an average coach (which I do), that would put him around 30 when comparing him to the Power 5 (65 total).
While several could be debated, a UT fan shouldn't think twice about taking Malzahn, Mullen, or McElwain.
Tweet about the article ranking the coaches....
Hearing there is some consternation out there about our ranking of Butch Jones. It was unanimously low. Ballots: 46-49-50-53-54.
-Adam Silverstein
He is what he is....an 8-9 win career average coach, who ALWAYS finds a way to lose a game he shouldn't, and may occasionally win a surprise too.
He does it clean, and his players get good grades. He is a cartoon character for the media with his cliches and over the top catchphrases. He is a fantastic program manager, and a suspect game manager. He has proven to be a formidable recruiter, while being a questionable developer of talent. He is classy, and positive while managing to be campy and annoying. He will regularly get you to a bowl game, unfortunately it will be one you really don't want to go to. He is a dream come true for a mid-major or lower tier P5 team, and a point of derision for what should be a top-15 team. He is something for everybody, and quite simply the most divisive coach in our history. He is an enigma wrapped in a riddle.
I'm not sure if he is too low on the list or not, but he shouldn't nearly round out the top half.