Another Cohen client!!!

#303
#303
OuterBanksVol said:
Dusty Rhodes would make a fine Press Secretary for trump.

View attachment 155866
Click to expand...

Not enough "WOO!" in those conferences.

1510090139247.jpg
 
#304
#304
Sin City Vol said:
Yes they do!!!! If you don’t believe they lie you’re just another sheep falling in line. All of them blatantly lie.
Click to expand...

I don't watch any of the news channels because they all have an agenda and are using stories (or omitting stories) to create narratives, but I'm having a hard time thinking of an instance where they have actually intentionally reported untrue things. Maybe I've missed it. Care to give me some examples?
 
#305
#305
SamRebel35 said:
I don't watch any of the news channels because they all have an agenda and are using stories (or omitting stories) to create narratives, but I'm having a hard time thinking of an instance where they have actually intentionally reported untrue things. Maybe I've missed it. Care to give me some examples?
Click to expand...

We know CNN has had plenty...

CNN controversies - Wikipedia
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#306
#306
SamRebel35 said:
I don't watch any of the news channels because they all have an agenda and are using stories (or omitting stories) to create narratives, but I'm having a hard time thinking of an instance where they have actually intentionally reported untrue things. Maybe I've missed it. Care to give me some examples?
Click to expand...

FOX's file: | PunditFact
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#307
#307
SamRebel35 said:
I don't watch any of the news channels because they all have an agenda and are using stories (or omitting stories) to create narratives, but I'm having a hard time thinking of an instance where they have actually intentionally reported untrue things. Maybe I've missed it. Care to give me some examples?
Click to expand...

One network edited recordings of the 911 call concerning the Trayvon Martin shooting. A network also set explosives in a Ford truck's gas tanks and ran it as a story.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#310
#310
Grand Vol said:
I think we've already discussed how biased Politifact is...

There is zero criteria for their judgments of "truth."
Click to expand...

OF course it’s biased... it wouldn’t run this if it weren’t.
Twitter

Since the basically repeat everything the president says and he averages 5.5 lies per day...sooooo
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#311
#311
tennvols77 said:
For those who say Hannity should have disclosed his "relationship", do you also feel the same about the litany of names who worked under, or in the Obama administration and those people's family and relationships who were in the media when reporting on any story relatable to having to disclose those relationships?
Click to expand...

Anyone on the leaning left want to try and tackle the hypocrisy.........
 
#314
#314
Sin City Vol said:
Screeeeeeeeech
Click to expand...

It isn't, nor am I, screeching, I want an honest answer. Once again, I hold no allegiance to any party much less to any media outlet. I could care less if you lefties and righties have a civil war, don't care how much so many people live in blindness and tote pathetic party lines and support any DC agenda.

It's pertinent and ties directly into the screeching you are doing concerning this thread. The scenario's are the same, and unfortunately for the left leaning side, it's apparent that you should have the same screeching outrage concerning the previous 8 years as you do right now.

A "news" person, reporting on something that apparently, they had a personal inclusion into a story being reported, and didn't disclose those "ties" to the story being reported and people involved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#317
#317
tennvols77 said:
It isn't, nor am I, screeching, I want an honest answer. Once again, I hold no allegiance to any party much less to any media outlet. I could care less if you lefties and righties have a civil war, don't care how much so many people live in blindness and tote pathetic party lines and support any DC agenda.

It's pertinent and ties directly into the screeching you are doing concerning this thread. The scenario's are the same, and unfortunately for the left leaning side, it's apparent that you should have the same screeching outrage concerning the previous 8 years as you do right now.

A "news" person, reporting on something that apparently, they had a personal inclusion into a story being reported, and didn't disclose those "ties" to the story being reported and people involved.
Click to expand...

I think that's more the rule than the exception. I believe it is a myth that there was ever some period of neutral journalism. Most newspapers in this country started out as party papers (Arkansas Democrat for example). When TV and radio came out, these "journalists" exalted themselves as trusted gatekeepers and people bought it. It stretches my imagination to believe that the sale of tv and radio spectrum, which was a political process by the gov, landed in the laps of honest operators.
 
#319
#319
tennvols77 said:
It isn't, nor am I, screeching, I want an honest answer. Once again, I hold no allegiance to any party much less to any media outlet. I could care less if you lefties and righties have a civil war, don't care how much so many people live in blindness and tote pathetic party lines and support any DC agenda.

It's pertinent and ties directly into the screeching you are doing concerning this thread. The scenario's are the same, and unfortunately for the left leaning side, it's apparent that you should have the same screeching outrage concerning the previous 8 years as you do right now.

A "news" person, reporting on something that apparently, they had a personal inclusion into a story being reported, and didn't disclose those "ties" to the story being reported and people involved.
Click to expand...

Good luck trying to be bipartisan in here. About 80% of the posters have their head buried in the sand and are doing nothing more than carrying water for whichever side they support.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#320
#320
FleeceItOut said:
Good luck trying to be bipartisan in here. About 80% of the posters have there head buried in the sand and are doing nothing more than carrying water for whichever side they support.
Click to expand...

Agreed. The remaining 20% are conservative or libertarian.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#322
#322
What's funny is your response of screech, you automatically assume I am a Republican or Trump supporter or on the "other side" with the reply of screeeech as if my question were anything other than an honest question I am putting out there, versus a designed reaction to the subject at hand from a party line toting shill.

I'm not. I'm an equal opportunity hater, I really don't care about any of it or any of you honestly, I don't care if the lefty dems and righty R's have a civil war, I care about my family and friends, and besides that, don't care if you all kill eachother. I view most of this with utter disdain and contempt and disgust. It's the same shell game that has been going on for decades, and the citizens of this country keep electing pathetic corruptible pos who do nothing in terms of solving problems and keep getting re-elected by fools who listen and or believe anything that is fed to them.

And Sin, understand you are one of the left leaning whom I've read and seen all over this forum and fall into the not a bad guy category, so please don't take this response as some type of childish call out.
 
Last edited:
#323
#323
FleeceItOut said:
Good luck trying to be bipartisan in here. About 80% of the posters have there head buried in the sand and are doing nothing more than carrying water for whichever side they support.
Click to expand...

.....and then there's the rest of us, the rational and reasonable 20%.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top