Another Cohen client!!!

So is everybody in their refractory period up in this thread yet? I figured LG, Luther, and Outerbanks might need a cigarette after all this excitement. BTW, has Hannity been beaten and dragged away in handcuffs for his awful, yet unknown crimes yet?
 
I know this is the never ending debate, but you can't truly believe that all news outlets are equally slanted and biased. That would be impossible even if that were the goal.

Correct because there is a left slant and a right slant ... or maybe the wrong slant, and I have a feeling that there are many many more - possibly related to the growing inability to look in your pants and define a sex. Maybe it's all about the growing psychiatric abuse over the years ... if you don't like who you are or what you believe, we can fix that; probably morphing on to if you don't believe what he thinks, we can fix that, too.
 
What's funny is your response of screech, you automatically assume I am a Republican or Trump supporter or on the "other side" with the reply of screeeech as if my question were anything other than an honest question I am putting out there, versus a designed reaction to the subject at hand from a party line toting shill.

I'm not. I'm an equal opportunity hater, I really don't care about any of it or any of you honestly, I don't care if the lefty dems and righty R's have a civil war, I care about my family and friends, and besides that, don't care if you all kill eachother. I view most of this with utter disdain and contempt and disgust. It's the same shell game that has been going on for decades, and the citizens of this country keep electing pathetic corruptible pos who do nothing in terms of solving problems and keep getting re-elected by fools who listen and or believe anything that is fed to them.

And Sin, understand you are one of the left leaning whom I've read and seen all over this forum and fall into the not a bad guy category, so please don't take this response as some type of childish call out.

I think there are some very subtle things, too. For example, look at the number of Hispanic reporters on major network news. Does it reflect the available resources, or is it a way of saying "See, Jose is a good guy after all, so why should we be tightening up the border?" Propagandists have found ways of moving a message in many subtle ways.

The other thing I've noticed is repetition and exclusion. Night after night of stories favorable to anti-guns or how "little" we've done for Puerto Rico, but total exclusion of news that you find easily on the internet (both sides) that don't fit the agenda. They rarely miss an opportunity for "humanitarian" stuff - good liberal touchy feely fluff on how we should be solving all the problems for the rest of the world, but not a word about how we became a culture in a position to do so while those cultures failed.

One very good recent example was the use of the HS kids for the anti gun lobby. They portrayed it on TV as kids out to make a statement about societal ills - at least the guns (not people) kill part. However, they were completely unethical, misleading, and biased in not reporting that the kids were actually being backed and used by the anti-gun lobby. No different with respect to the organized "spontaneous" rallies that spring up when someone with a conservative view attempts to speak - just amazing how all those people follow their feelings and just happened to be in the neighborhood - frequently with professionally printed signs and banners.
 
Lol. You want Pence.

rs0x2mdrvvqz.jpg
 
It isn't, nor am I, screeching, I want an honest answer. Once again, I hold no allegiance to any party much less to any media outlet. I could care less if you lefties and righties have a civil war, don't care how much so many people live in blindness and tote pathetic party lines and support any DC agenda.

It's pertinent and ties directly into the screeching you are doing concerning this thread. The scenario's are the same, and unfortunately for the left leaning side, it's apparent that you should have the same screeching outrage concerning the previous 8 years as you do right now.

A "news" person, reporting on something that apparently, they had a personal inclusion into a story being reported, and didn't disclose those "ties" to the story being reported and people involved.

More screeeeeeeeech
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Only said to you after X amount of posts over a Y timeframe.

It's amazing how something practically incomprehensible can be made so clear and understandable by just framing it through the prism of x and y.

You're welcome everyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
It's amazing how something practically incomprehensible can be made so clear and understandable by just framing it through the prism of x and y.

You're welcome everyone.

Life is viewed through a 3-D lens, why not x, y and z? What about r, theta and phi? Why not include partial and second order differentials?

You’re a self-admitted mathematical genius, let’s make this interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Fox News continues to prove that they are a Trump propaganda channel. A legitimate News Organization would have had Hannity disclose that he is a client/friend of Cohen's before any segment in which Hannity reported on Cohen. Fox has zero credibility.

Be careful Trump gets all his ideas from Fox News
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Apparently, Judge Wood was initially disposed to let that happen. Then, however, the judge allowed Robert Balin, an attorney for the New York Times and CNN, to intervene. Balin, the Times reports, argued that potential embarrassment was not a sufficient reason to withhold the purported client’s name from the public. The judge was somehow persuaded by this frivolous contention. Without providing Hannity any notice and opportunity to be heard on the matter, she directed that his name be disclosed in open court.

The Outrageous Outing of Sean Hannity, Cont’d
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Apparently, Judge Wood was initially disposed to let that happen. Then, however, the judge allowed Robert Balin, an attorney for the New York Times and CNN, to intervene. Balin, the Times reports, argued that potential embarrassment was not a sufficient reason to withhold the purported client’s name from the public. The judge was somehow persuaded by this frivolous contention. Without providing Hannity any notice and opportunity to be heard on the matter, she directed that his name be disclosed in open court.

The Outrageous Outing of Sean Hannity, Cont’d

Glad Wood is a card carrying member of the Deep State
 
Life is viewed through a 3-D lens, why not x, y and z? What about r, theta and phi? Why not include partial and second order differentials?

You’re a self-admitted mathematical genius, let’s make this interesting.

Consider the audience. Two dimensional thought gives many on here seizures. Even straight linear is a stretch for some.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Consider the audience. Two dimensional thought gives many on here seizures. Even straight linear is a stretch for some.

You mean like a line? That kind of linear? Described by .... wait for it... waaaaaaaaaait for it... coefficients of X slope and Y intercept? 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Trump has muted Rocket Man and Putin. Trump keeps winning.

Cnn and MSNBC and the dims are screaming at us about a Prostitute.

Trump needs to silence himself...and I love how Stormy is a prostitute (which Trump paid $130k to bone) so being a prostitute is wrong but paying for one isn't...but Melania the nude gold digging model is classy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
Hannity has made a career out of self-righteously humiliating others. But Hannity does it with lies, slants, innuendo, and half truths.

So does practically every host on XM urban view and the progress channel. Talk about completely dividing this nation, those hosts are f@*#ing professionals at it.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top