SamRebel35
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2009
- Messages
- 15,803
- Likes
- 12,857
I know this is the never ending debate, but you can't truly believe that all news outlets are equally slanted and biased. That would be impossible even if that were the goal.
What's funny is your response of screech, you automatically assume I am a Republican or Trump supporter or on the "other side" with the reply of screeeech as if my question were anything other than an honest question I am putting out there, versus a designed reaction to the subject at hand from a party line toting shill.
I'm not. I'm an equal opportunity hater, I really don't care about any of it or any of you honestly, I don't care if the lefty dems and righty R's have a civil war, I care about my family and friends, and besides that, don't care if you all kill eachother. I view most of this with utter disdain and contempt and disgust. It's the same shell game that has been going on for decades, and the citizens of this country keep electing pathetic corruptible pos who do nothing in terms of solving problems and keep getting re-elected by fools who listen and or believe anything that is fed to them.
And Sin, understand you are one of the left leaning whom I've read and seen all over this forum and fall into the not a bad guy category, so please don't take this response as some type of childish call out.
It isn't, nor am I, screeching, I want an honest answer. Once again, I hold no allegiance to any party much less to any media outlet. I could care less if you lefties and righties have a civil war, don't care how much so many people live in blindness and tote pathetic party lines and support any DC agenda.
It's pertinent and ties directly into the screeching you are doing concerning this thread. The scenario's are the same, and unfortunately for the left leaning side, it's apparent that you should have the same screeching outrage concerning the previous 8 years as you do right now.
A "news" person, reporting on something that apparently, they had a personal inclusion into a story being reported, and didn't disclose those "ties" to the story being reported and people involved.
It's amazing how something practically incomprehensible can be made so clear and understandable by just framing it through the prism of x and y.
You're welcome everyone.
Fox News continues to prove that they are a Trump propaganda channel. A legitimate News Organization would have had Hannity disclose that he is a client/friend of Cohen's before any segment in which Hannity reported on Cohen. Fox has zero credibility.
Apparently, Judge Wood was initially disposed to let that happen. Then, however, the judge allowed Robert Balin, an attorney for the New York Times and CNN, to intervene. Balin, the Times reports, argued that potential embarrassment was not a sufficient reason to withhold the purported clients name from the public. The judge was somehow persuaded by this frivolous contention. Without providing Hannity any notice and opportunity to be heard on the matter, she directed that his name be disclosed in open court.
The Outrageous Outing of Sean Hannity, Contd
Life is viewed through a 3-D lens, why not x, y and z? What about r, theta and phi? Why not include partial and second order differentials?
Youre a self-admitted mathematical genius, lets make this interesting.
Trump has muted Rocket Man and Putin. Trump keeps winning.
Cnn and MSNBC and the dims are screaming at us about a Prostitute.