Another Cohen client!!!

...and Dims has everyone else.

Solid comeback Brick.

200.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
If by "my news" you mean pretty much every outlet comprising mainstream media, then yes, they are largely not misleading the public.

If course, any news that Donald doesn't like is "fake news".

Hmm. Define "misleading". Fox News doesn't blatantly lie, do they? They simply try to frame the news a certain way. Pretty sure the rest of mainstream media do that as well. You just agree with the way they frame issues, so it's not "misleading" to you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
My news network is better than your news network is about as juvenile and my dad can beat up your dad.
 
If by "my news" you mean pretty much every outlet comprising mainstream media, then yes, they are largely not misleading the public.

If course, any news that Donald doesn't like is "fake news".

For those who say Hannity should have disclosed his "relationship", do you also feel the same about the litany of names who worked under, or in the Obama administration and those people's family and relationships who were in the media when reporting on any story relatable to having to disclose those relationships?

Just a few snippets concerning that below.

If ABC and CBS were both favorably disposed toward Trump and both had family members or spouses both working in the news network and the Trump administration, can you imagine what they would think if somebody running CBS News favorably covering Trump had a brother working in Trump’s foreign policy.....

Imagine if one of Donald Trump’s chief advisers and a deputy national-security adviser was the brother of the current CBS News president, while the sister of the ABC News president was another one of Trump’s top national- security and energy advisers......

Virginia Moseley, CNN vice president, Washington bureau chief, married to Tom Nides, who was deputy secretary of state under Obama.

And then there is David Rhodes and his brother, Ben Rhodes, Ben Rhodes was a top foreign policy adviser to Obama while his brother is the president of CBS News.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
For those who say Hannity should have disclosed his "relationship", do you also feel the same about the litany of names who worked under, or in the Obama administration and those people's family and relationships who were in the media when reporting on any story relatable to having to disclose those relationships?

Just a few snippets concerning that below.

If ABC and CBS were both favorably disposed toward Trump and both had family members or spouses both working in the news network and the Trump administration, can you imagine what they would think if somebody running CBS News favorably covering Trump had a brother working in Trump’s foreign policy.....

Imagine if one of Donald Trump’s chief advisers and a deputy national-security adviser was the brother of the current CBS News president, while the sister of the ABC News president was another one of Trump’s top national- security and energy advisers......

Virginia Moseley, CNN vice president, Washington bureau chief, married to Tom Nides, who was deputy secretary of state under Obama.

And then there is David Rhodes and his brother, Ben Rhodes, Ben Rhodes was a top foreign policy adviser to Obama while his brother is the president of CBS News.

Dusty Rhodes would make a fine Press Secretary for trump.

dusty_rhodes.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
Maybe he would, but, the hypocrisy and conflict of interests is important in distinguishing the reactions, reportings, and agenda's that are currently coming to light.

All I want is fair, what is good for one side is equally good for the other. From someone who is sitting back and watching all of this it is apparent that both hypocrisy and conflict of interests are ok for one side, but, not the other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I know this is the never ending debate, but you can't truly believe that all news outlets are equally slanted and biased. That would be impossible even if that were the goal.

Maybe not all outlets but yes all of the MSM (network) outlets and major newspapers are slanted one way or the other. They ALL cater to their audiences for ratings/sales reasons. It's not about presenting the facts anymore it's 100% about money and supplying what their audience wants to see and hear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Maybe not all outlets but yes all of the MSM (network) outlets and major newspapers are slanted one way or the other. They ALL cater to their audiences for ratings/sales reasons. It's not about presenting the facts anymore it's 100% about money and supplying what their audience wants to see and hear.

Truth. Rumors and gossip and opinions, with little facts, presented just the way their audience is looking to eat it up as gospel. Both sides.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Truth. Rumors and gossip and opinions, with little facts, presented just the way their audience is looking to eat it up as gospel. Both sides.

Exactly, none of them are "news networks" anymore. They are information and opinion networks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Hmm. Define "misleading". Fox News doesn't blatantly lie, do they? They simply try to frame the news a certain way. Pretty sure the rest of mainstream media do that as well. You just agree with the way they frame issues, so it's not "misleading" to you.

Yes they do!!!! If you don’t believe they lie you’re just another sheep falling in line. All of them blatantly lie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Advertisement

Back
Top