I just posted this on another site, but how good are they really? To pass the off season, I went back and watched a few of their games. For starters, they are predominantly a zone team. Most of Amerson's picks were not due to great 1 on 1 coverage but instead reading the QB in zone coverage. Here are some other things that jump out when watching a couple of their games and also looking at game logs:
10 of Amerson's 13 INTs came from vs. these teams
Liberty- 2 INTs
South Alabama- 1 INT
Central Michigan- 2 INTs
Virginia- 2 INTs (go look at how horrible Rocco was last year)
Boston College- 1 INT (go look at how horrible Rettig was last year)
Louisville- 2 (pathetic passing offense).
That's 10 of his INTs!
Vs. Cincy he had 1 INT but but Cincy's top 2 WRs combined for 11 catches for 166 yards.
Vs. Wake Forest, Givens (their best WR) had 111 yds on 6 catches. Their top 3 WRs combined for 300 yds and 2 TDs on 17 catches.
Vs. FSU, their top 3 WRs had 180 yds and 2 tds on just 15 catches.
Vs. Maryland he got burnt twice by Dorsey including one for a TD and the other for a 59 yd. gain. He ended up with 3 catches for 88 yds.
10 of Amerson's 13 INTs came from vs. these teams
Liberty- 2 INTs
South Alabama- 1 INT
Central Michigan- 2 INTs
Virginia- 2 INTs (go look at how horrible Rocco was last year)
Boston College- 1 INT (go look at how horrible Rettig was last year)
Louisville- 2 (pathetic passing offense).
That's 10 of his INTs!
Vs. Cincy he had 1 INT but but Cincy's top 2 WRs combined for 11 catches for 166 yards.
Vs. Wake Forest, Givens (their best WR) had 111 yds on 6 catches. Their top 3 WRs combined for 300 yds and 2 TDs on 17 catches.
Vs. FSU, their top 3 WRs had 180 yds and 2 tds on just 15 catches.
Vs. Maryland he got burnt twice by Dorsey including one for a TD and the other for a 59 yd. gain. He ended up with 3 catches for 88 yds.