Amateur Hour Continues

Like you and pj, he is bias. Difference between me and you 3 is I have no problem admitting my bias. I will be here until pj goes all twitter and starts blocking us conservatives.
I’ve been around here long enough to know that neither Huff or PJ are big liberals. And you have as well.
 
I don't wish to get in one of those endless loops with you.
I said many feel that obstruction rises to the level.
I then said "I guess we can all agree to that."
Obviously meaning that we can all agree that many feel Trump obstructed to a level justifying impeachment.
You still have difficulty grasping that 3rd dimension.
T hat's not what you said. I quoted and bolded. Go read it again.
 
That you're really reaching to try and make this lady's issues about politics. Seems she has done the same thing before Trump
Well, this is the PF , you gonna call people out now about over reaching?

You're going to be very, very busy now.
 
Well, this is the PF forum, you gonna call people out now about over reaching?

You're going to be very, very busy now.
No I was simply commenting on an article that was posted. Trying to tie it back to a political party is ridiculous.
 
No I was simply commenting on an article that was posted. Trying to tie it back to a political party is ridiculous.
IIRC, it wasn't tied to a "political party" but to "liberals" in general.

Do you think she was a "conservative"?
 
Maybe not, but the Tea Party types sure were. Maybe they didn’t like something about the past president other than spending.
They kind of fizzeled out even before Trump's election. They kind of gave up after Obama was reelected.

Wonder where they all went, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
No she was simply crazy. I wouldn't even attempt to tie it to a political view
Of course you wouldn't. But she said what she said and it was reported as such.

What if this had happened in "Obama's America".

Of course, that wouldn't happen, would it.
 
No he definitely isn't a fiscal conservative, but at least he is redirecting our money towards better things like the military and a border wall instead of handouts to non Americans.
Our military doesn’t need extra money and anyone who actually believes Trump will complete his wall has brain damage.
 
Are any of his hopeful replacements fiscal conservatives?

Laughing at the argument here.

As if that is the reason most people vote for who they vote for. No one wants to bring the pain, no one.
 
No he definitely isn't a fiscal conservative, but at least he is redirecting our money towards better things like the military and a border wall instead of handouts to non Americans.
Yeah if there's one place I don't think we spend enough money it's definitely the military
 
Are any of his hopeful replacements fiscal conservatives?

Laughing at the argument here.

As if that is the reason most people vote for who they vote for. No one wants to bring the pain, no one.

The dangers of democracies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Like you and pj, he is bias. Difference between me and you 3 is I have no problem admitting my bias. I will be here until pj goes all twitter and starts blocking us conservatives.

I am biased, it's not a difficult thing for me to admit. Everybody is biased, but the difference between you and me is that you don't care that you are biased. Your bias is so strong that willfully ignore the truth.

And you're not a conservative, you're a Republican. I'm more of a traditional conservative than you are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mick and Septic
Are any of his hopeful replacements fiscal conservatives?

Laughing at the argument here.

As if that is the reason most people vote for who they vote for. No one wants to bring the pain, no one.
They don't care about spending or deficits, they just want to use it as another weapon to hit Trump on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64

VN Store



Back
Top