Purple Tiger
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2018
- Messages
- 4,247
- Likes
- 1,425
The constituents would set the agenda. Representatives are supposed to represent the people that elect them, not serve a party. Loyalty to those you represent should always be paramount. Instead we get loyalty to the party line.
Ridiculous assertion. The reps and senators need to insure their responses to national issues are in line with their states citizens and leadership. Their allegiance is to the state they are representing not a party agenda... or it should be.The state governor is not responsible for, or versed in, national issues.
Ridiculous assertion. The reps and senators need to insure their responses to national issues are in line with their states citizens and leadership. Their allegiance is to the state they are representing not a party agenda... or it should be.
The reps and senators should absolutely consider the impact of that policy item and every other one on their states citizens and involve their states leadership in the discussion or they are not representing their constituents.Quick, someone ask Governor Bill Lee whether the U.S. should be pushing China in the South China Sea or not.
I remember studying it in high school and again in college. Finding the sweet spot was always the most difficult and it was completely dependent on various economic factors. Yes Laffer really screwed Kansas up. They passed the tax cut he helped design, then the state ran a huge deficit which lead to the Republicans lose the legislature and Governorship.In the broad sense it's true, but where is the sweet spot?
![]()
Laffer was a paid advisor for Kansas' tax cut experiment. That ended well.
I question the need for congressional committees to begin with. IMO they encourage partisan hackery by taking up partisan issues. Most often when I hear of a committee, it's because they're bitterly arguing partisan issues rather than actually addressing national needs. There doesn't need to be "specialization". That's just a line to keep the sheep from straying. Committees, IMO, are really more about creating powerbases.No representative is going to be able to address all policy issues. That's why they specialize, to some degree, on congressional committees.
Maybe because they realize we live in a country that chooses to provide roads, parks, prisons, schools, courts, police and fire protection, emergency services, disaster relief, child and elderly care services, and also the world's strongest military.What is it about leftists that give them such determination to willingly allow the government take something you earned? I don't get it.
Laffer curve guides to maximum revenue. Politicians can and do outspend the revenue. That's not on Laffer. That's on the Kansas idiots who spend the revenue.I remember studying it in high school and again in college. Finding the sweet spot was always the most difficult and it was completely dependent on various economic factors. Yes Laffer really screwed Kansas up. They passed the tax cut he helped design, then the state ran a huge deficit which lead to the Republicans lose the legislature and Governorship.
I question the need for congressional committees to begin with. IMO they encourage partisan hackery by taking up partisan issues. Most often when I hear of a committee, it's because they're bitterly arguing partisan issues rather than actually addressing national needs. There doesn't need to be "specialization". That's just a line to keep the sheep from straying. Committees, IMO, are really more about creating powerbases.
What is the point of a representative if he doesn't speak for the people he represents?
Someone always has to be first. Just because you've never known different doesn't mean different cannot be better. If our FFs followed your train of thought, we'd still be an English colony.Still waiting for anyone to cite a country that doesn't have political parties.
I consider them a necessary evil until shown otherwise.
I agree that elected officials should exercise independence and not just vote the party line. But you've got to have the organizing structure that parties provide.