Amateur Hour Continues

[Rasputin_Vol]

The cult sheep are in for a rude awakening. Well honestly we all are.

Interesting

 

[Velo Vol]

Why suspend them at all?

Because there's a lot of people susceptible to believing things that are destructive to society.

 

[hog88]

Because there's a lot of people susceptible to believing things that are destructive to society.

LOL

Weakest argument yet.

 

[RockyTop85]

LOL

Weakest argument yet.

But still strong enough to overcome demands that he justifiy a specific use of a property by its owner.

 

[hog88]

But still strong enough to overcome demands that he justifiy a specific use of a property by its owner.

Nobody is arguing that twitter or other SM platforms do not have the right to ban/suspend whoever they want for whatever reason they want. The argument is over the federal government pressuring them to do so and deciding what should be censored.

 

[Velo Vol]

I don't think it's a good thing to shut down accounts at all. But in some cases it's the lesser of two evils.

 

[RockyTop85]

Nobody is arguing that twitter or other SM platforms do not have the right to ban/suspend whoever they want for whatever reason they want. The argument is over the federal government pressuring them to do so and deciding what should be censored.

“The federal government made them do it” was the predictable, unsupported, shrieky, hysterical pivot that occurred only after Velo and clarksvol pointed out that it’s their property to use how they want. Ras already posted the link that shows that the government didn’t actually make them do anything, then went back to “why do it at all,” which can clearly be seen in the post you replied to.

 

[hog88]

“The federal government made them do it” was the predictable, unsupported, shrieky, hysterical pivot that occurred only after Velo and clarksvol pointed out that it’s their property to use how they want. Ras already posted the link that shows that the government didn’t actually make them do anything, then went back to “why do it at all,” which can clearly be seen in the post you replied to.

They were threatened with the anti-trust laws. They started banning critics and boom all the talk from the Dems about breaking them up magically went away.

 

[Velo Vol]

They were threatened with the anti-trust laws. They started banning critics and boom all the talk from the Dems about breaking them up magically went away.

But not the talk from all politicians.

 

[RockyTop85]

They were threatened with the anti-trust laws. They started banning critics and boom all the talk from the Dems about breaking them up magically went away.

There’s not even enough here to remove the “unsupported” adjective, much less any of the others.

They were never threatened and talk of breaking them up didn’t “go away.” It’s less talked about because the chief proponent dropped out of the presidential primary election. She’s still harping on her anti-trust bill to anybody who will listen, but fewer people are listening.

 

[Velo Vol]

They were never threatened and talk of breaking them up didn’t “go away.” It’s less talked about because the chief proponent dropped out of the presidential primary election. She’s still harping on her anti-trust bill to anybody who will listen, but fewer people are listening.

I think they are threatened, in the sense that politicians want to "do something" about them. But since the rationale for doing something is coming from very different places, it'll take real movement for the drive to coalesce on a bill that can actually pass.

 

[RockyTop85]

I think they are threatened, in the sense that politicians want to "do something" about them. But since the rationale for doing something is coming from very different places, it'll take real movement for the drive to coalesce on a bill that can actually pass.

That’s not a use of the word “threatened” that would create anything resembling a principle/agent relationship between the government and the companies, though.

 

[evillawyer]

That’s not a use of the word “threatened” that would create anything resembling a principle/agent relationship between the government and the companies, though.

Oh snap. Restatement of Agency bout ready to get broken out.

 

[evillawyer]

Because everyone knows snow and ice magically retreat like little b*tches when they see cops with military grade stuff.

 

[Velo Vol]

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

LOL .... Talk about being tone-deaf, this dumbass has no clue to anything in the real world.

This May Be One of the Most Tone-deaf Messages Kamala Harris Has Ever Tweeted

 

[Velo Vol]

Good grief.

 

[evillawyer]

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

“The federal government made them do it” was the predictable, unsupported, shrieky, hysterical pivot that occurred only after Velo and clarksvol pointed out that it’s their property to use how they want. Ras already posted the link that shows that the government didn’t actually make them do anything, then went back to “why do it at all,” which can clearly be seen in the post you replied to.

Bulls^^t. They admitted to helping them selected material that was being called "misinformation". WTF are you talking about?

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Because everyone knows snow and ice magically retreat like little b*tches when they see cops with military grade stuff.

Now that is crazy talk.

 

[evillawyer]

 

[evillawyer]

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

What's wrong with this idiot? Is he not getting enough attention to be laughed at already?
Nobody can find him on a regular day. All they need to do is look for Nancy & he'll show up.
Nobody was looking for this dumb chit on that January day last year. He isn't that important.

Chuck Schumer: I Was Targeted on January 6 Because of My Religion

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Pelosi blames Trump supporters for a murder that's done by a Farrakhan devotee.
Pelosi is ready to be carried off to the funny farm for the treatment of being plain stupid.
Pelosi is so delusional & hears voices in her head & believes things that's not in reality.

Pelosi Blames Trump Supporters for a Murder Committed by a Farrakhan Devotee

 

[RockyTop85]

Bulls^^t. They admitted to helping them selected material that was being called "misinformation". WTF are you talking about?

Are you really admitting that you don’t understand the difference between reporting content that violates the website’s terms of service and “dictating to a private business to shut down political opponents” or “federal government deciding what should be censored?”