A Question:

Im arguing that hardesty was another opportunity to make himself look smart. He didnt have a track record. the depth chart a running back should have looked like this. 1. hardesty 2. creer 3. poole. 4. Brown 5. oku
Creer was exactly what we needed at that position last yr that we didnt have against florida alabama va tech. At safety he saw a prime opportunity to start jackson. Make no mistake jackson is very good and played well last yr. But demetrice morley was a hell of a football player as well. And on the offensive line he chose walkons just so he could look good if they played half way decent. And ultimately his planned worked because you guys are still sucking him off. Even though he didnt beat one team that was better than us and lost to at least 2 that were inferior. But youll see his inconsistent work ethic and attention to detail will never allow him to win big. oh yeah and terrible pressure decision making.

hardesty had 3 more rushing attempts than creer did in 2008. so how is starting hardesy over creer going with a guy with less of a track record?
 
I forgot about coleman. Best qb from 08, thats for sure. Best qb in the spring of 09 thats for sure. But somehow buried 3rd on the depth chart.

Wrong again. He was co-bracketed at the top of the depth chart with Crompton. But just like the other morons in this city, you bought the garbage that whiner spewed to the Times Free Press hook, line, and sinker.
 
B.J. Coleman was a Nancy who didn't want to compete.

Exactly. He wanted to be handed the starting job when he didn't earn it. The fact he ended up at the FCS version of Vanderbilt is further evidence of how overrated he is.
 
No they didnt prove to be better than him. 5.9 and 5.3 ypg. He quit because he was buried unfairly on the depth chart just like coleman

Yea he was a stud against UAB, Vandy and Wyoming, Southern Miss and La.-Lafayette.

What was his YPC against Florida, GA, LSU, UK, Miss. St. and Bama?
 
montario hardesty didnt have atrack record. He did not play the best players available at many positions. He knew that if he played walkons or kicked proven players off in spots where he could play freshmen he did it to make himself look good. There is no doubt about it. It was a win win situation if these players played well he would be praised. If they didnt he would have an excuse
Posted via VolNation Mobile

roll.gif
 
What exactly does this have to do with fulmer?? Is that you morons only comeback. Can anyone actually dispute what I am saying??

Its called historical relevance.

If what you're saying is that Kiffin didn't play the best players, then I completely and unequivocally dispute such an asinine idea.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top