A New Site For All The Naysayers

#76
#76
volfannbama said:
Like the gruden thrwads? Lol
Click to expand...

Those whining about it to Freak was embarrassing, I couldn't believe they were actually serious about it. But I will say this, the ones they were actually whining about were just as embarrassing. Both parties acted like spoiled little 8 year old girls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens and volfannbama
#78
#78
joevol33 said:
How do some confuse speaking truth with being negative? I'm always for our team, but I can realistically see how bad they are.
Click to expand...
For me the negative is how they predict the future. Sure it’s easy to say we played bad last week so that must mean we will play bad next week, with no chance of improvement.

Other than not being able to run the ball(Very big deal.) we had a solid game against Auburn. The negative guy would say it was a fluke game against an Auburn team that was reeling after their loss to Ms St and we shouldn’t expect a repeat performance. The optimist would say that we had a solid game other than being able to run the ball(A very big deal.) against an Auburn team that Ms St softened up for us and I expect us to use that performance as a spring board for the rest of the year.

One likes to twist the knife while the other won’t twist the knife.

Every other fan base bashes our players, coaches and facilities. It would be a nice change for our own to lay off a little just to show we can pull together over something other than the near hiring of an alleged cover upper.

I’ve got a question.
We all know how the gumps feel about being snitched on for cheating. Do the feel the same about being snitched on for Penn St type mess?
 
#80
#80
GetYouSomeofThat said:
And yet so many of the sunshine pumpers continue to say our players are lazy, dumb and/or untalented and that coaching has zero to do with the current record.

Personally I have no idea why anyone would want to post in an echo chamber/circle jerk but I suppose if that's your thing it isnt any of my business..😁
Click to expand...
Aha, the old one handed typing trick!
 
#81
#81
Pride85 said:
No, but it would be nice to have a thread with posters that actually discuss the topic of the thread without posting the exact same agenda without regard to the conversation.
Click to expand...

This right here... And if you notice.. That the majority of a thread started by someone with a positive thought.. The very first reply is almost always a negative comment.. And... If someone starts a thread about something that is a positive fact.. Like our punter up for a award etc.. All the regular posters that you can count on to have negative posts never post in those threads...

I spend way to much time here obviously! 😂
 
#82
#82
Haven’t been relevant in a decade+
Kinda hard to bash fans for being negative.
Be relevant again and positivity will follow.
 
#83
#83
surrealvol said:
Hey Freakie, I think a new site for all the naysayers, negavols, and other negative fans would be a good idea. That way they could chat with each other and see who coud be the most naysayerish! Seriously though, it would be nice to see more positives and fewer negatives come from our forums where we are supposed to be backing and encouraging these young men and women on our teams at U.T. I dare say that very, very few of them are not trying to give their all for U.T. while a large, large, large percentage of them are !!!
Click to expand...
I take it you have thin skin and that you're overly sensitive to the opinions of others. I think they call that being a "snowflake".
 
  • Like
Reactions: VOL_Lyfe
#85
#85
Weezer said:
I take it you have thin skin and that you're overly sensitive to the opinions of others. I think they call that being a "snowflake".
Click to expand...
I take it don’t agree with his opinion and choose to insult him and to call him names.
 
#86
#86
I'd be all about predicting great things for the Vols, continued improvement, etc....if they'd bench JG and put in KC!
 
#87
#87
With only 120 likes, you must have felt a lot of negative on this site...……………………………..
908l.PNG
 
#89
#89
Weezer said:
I take it you have thin skin and that you're overly sensitive to the opinions of others. I think they call that being a "snowflake".
Click to expand...
They also have names for those that call people other names like snowflake, pretty sure most of us had this argument in 4th grade!
 
#90
#90
PulaskiVolFan said:
They also have names for those that call people other names like snowflake, pretty sure most of us had this argument in 4th grade!
Click to expand...
FaithfulRevolvingJaeger-size_restricted.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
#98
#98
surrealvol said:
Hey Freakie, I think a new site for all the naysayers, negavols, and other negative fans would be a good idea. That way they could chat with each other and see who coud be the most naysayerish! Seriously though, it would be nice to see more positives and fewer negatives come from our forums where we are supposed to be backing and encouraging these young men and women on our teams at U.T. I dare say that very, very few of them are not trying to give their all for U.T. while a large, large, large percentage of them are !!!
Click to expand...
I can’t inagine a more pathetic idea than a forum where everyone just writes mindless support for a team. Forums are for commenting, giving opinions, and have quality debates. Not to have a contest on who can fluff the players the best. Good grief.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83, volfannbama and Jack Burton
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top