A&E decides

#151
#151
volmaverick said:
He did not single out gays

He did not compare homosexuality to bestiality. He listed drunkards, homosexuality, adultery, casual fornication, and bestiality as among behaviors he thought were immoral.

What's wrong with that?
Click to expand...
It was a little weird to even bring up beastiality. It's not like there's an epidemic of people humping roosters or something.
 
#153
#153
GAVol said:
It was a little weird to even bring up beastiality. It's not like there's an epidemic of people humping roosters or something.
Click to expand...

but it does exist

Bestiality is very common, and there is proof. Just visit the website beastforum.com -- as of March 2011, there are more than 874,000 members -- that's enough people to fill 20 baseball stadiums to full capacity.


Additionally, there is a Wikipedia article called "zoophilia", which discusses the history of zoosexuality. People have been having sex with animals for centuries and will continue to do so, no matter how many bigots try to stop them.
 
Last edited:
#155
#155
GAVol said:
It was a little weird to even bring up beastiality. It's not like there's an epidemic of people humping roosters or something.
Click to expand...

Funny you should bring up chickens. A few years ago around here in West TN. a man's wife caught him in the hen house having a good time fornicating w/the chickens. After that, he was always called the chicken man...haha.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#159
#159
volmaverick said:
but it does exist

Bestiality is very common, and there is proof. Just visit the website beastforum.com -- as of March 2011, there are more than 874,000 members -- that's enough people to fill 20 baseball stadiums to full capacity.


Additionally, there is a Wikipedia article called "zoophilia", which discusses the history of zoosexuality. People have been having sex with animals for centuries and will continue to do so, no matter how many bigots try to stop them.
Click to expand...




LG turn you on to that website ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#160
#160
volmaverick said:
then you will agree with a company that decides it does not want to hire blacks anymore
Click to expand...

I would say that's a racist-ass company if they're not considering a person solely based on their skin color. I'd be more concerned with experience and credentials.
 
#161
#161
Has anyone walked through anything from a truck stop, mom and pop store to wally-world lately or all the different commercials different family members have made or inked their own other type deals. They are making far more in commercials and product licensing than they will make on the show or the yearly re-run residuals.

I can also internet guarantee you if A&E drops this show another will snap it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#164
#164
Velo Vol said:
So an employer firing an employee for what that employee says is the same as an employer firing/not hiring someone over his or her race?
Click to expand...

Yes

Can a company fire someone for saying blacks are equal to whites?


freedom to run your company the way you want to is freedom to run your company. No ifs ands or butts
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#166
#166
volmaverick said:
but you support a company to be able to run it the way they see fit
..right
Click to expand...

You cry about people having their liberties trampled on, but you get mad when A&E exercise their rights? It's a national television network, not the Gander Mountain in Macon, GA. You can't expect such a network to condone remarks of this nature.
 
#168
#168
So u support an NFL owner firing a black that says a black can play QB as good as a white and should be the starter?

Chris4Vols22 said:
You cry about people having their liberties trampled on, but you get mad when A&E exercise their rights? It's a national television network, not the Gander Mountain in Macon, GA. You can't expect such a network to condone remarks of this nature.
Click to expand...
 
#172
#172
Chris4Vols22 said:
You cry about people having their liberties trampled on, but you get mad when A&E exercise their rights? It's a national television network, not the Gander Mountain in Macon, GA. You can't expect such a network to condone remarks of this nature.
Click to expand...

Remarks of this nature??
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#175
#175
tim said:
And who among us is without sin? This biblical reference about homosexuality is overplayed even if it is factual. The bible speaks of many sins that humans subscribe to and protest. To me, using Biblical arguments sometimes hides a personal bias or opinion. If so, just say so.
Click to expand...

Nobody is. It's frowned upon by christians for heterosexual couples to have sex before marriage kinda like they frown upon homosexuality. If a Christian expresses their thoughts on the heterosexual couple it's like "whatever". If they express thoughts on a homosexual couple it's the worst thing ever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top