Assuming this wasn't a sarcastic question, the answer from me is "it depends."
If he thinks that we have enough talent and depth on the DL to where we only needed to add 1 IDL and 2 Edge/SDE despite losing Eason/Moi/West/Bailey/Ross/Herring (I don't care about guys who didn't play like Wallace) then if he turns out to be wrong (i.e., it's not enough and the DL is subpar) then yes I will blame him. If he turns out to have been right because we get some combination of a glow-up from returnees + bigtime production from GIlliam/Coleman/Norman + a few of the large and impressive freshmen class, then he gets all the credit.
On the other hand, if he didn't think we have enough talent and depth on the DL and yet failed to acquire more than the 1 IDL and 2 Edge/SDE we did add, then yes I will blame him.