TBrown
Wolf of Beale Street
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2009
- Messages
- 67,113
- Likes
- 29,693
If you’re going to say “short of rings, which involves other variables” (I’m assuming you mean Brady’s defense) then you should also qualify all of Peyton’s stats with other variables ala supporting cast.Longevity isn’t a difference maker for me in saying one is clearly better than the other. Especially in football where it’s a crap shoot. Agree to disagree on that.
I don’t understand your point about 2007. It feels like you are saying what I said.
Recognize I am being nuanced in him being clearly better. Short of rings, which involves other variables, and INTs, they are pretty similar statistically (career averages). It’s not necessarily clear looking at the numbers. But I recognize this is the bazillionth time for this debate on VN.
The one year Brady had Moss was essentially the best the position has ever been played. It’s funny that people try to discredit Brady for his cushy setup in NE when he was making chicken salad out of chicken (not salad) for decades.