bleedorange0037
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2007
- Messages
- 15,189
- Likes
- 1,772
This makes me think of pacers bulls 1998 third round.
Neither team could win on the road and it went to 7 games. Although there were games that were close including I think game 4 that the bulls should have won but didn't because of I think pippin not making free throws.
I'd concede right now. There is absolutely 0 sense in running these guys legs out in a game they cannot win.
SA nearly scored 100 pts in 3 qtrs. Somethings wrong, dribble the game out and try to address what happened.
If this were football a defense giving up 56 points in three quarters.
So really it's playing for garbage time points, and make the score look better. This ain't baseball you have a time limit.
Dude, I'm really starting to like the hell out of you.
This is basketball. Its a damn marathon, and to this point, Brooks has allowed the older, stiff Spurs to outlast the young Thunder.
You've set off the bromance alert apevol.
This was back in the days of Nba on nbc. Those were great days, and the theme was stupendous.
Shaq and Barkley
They also make me think of grumpy old men. You can choose which one is lemon's character, and the other that is walter's character.
Thunder played longer than he wanted I think in game 4.
Even so this was the usual problem spurs shoot 51 percent hard to freakin beat a great team when they shoot like that.
That and as I just heard it went from bad to worse in the third. Spurs are a damn hard to beat on the road when they have a large lead. In my opinion 15 is the danger One, 11-14 is one inch from the danger zone, 10 or under is favorable.
So you are saying he should be removing starters earlier instead of playing for garbage time points?
