Ok, now post Burrow's statistics when he was at OSU, which would be what the Nebraska coaches based their decision off of, and his first season at LSU. Leave off last year, which nobody saw coming. No? Ok, I'll do it for you.
At Ohio State:
2016 - 78.6%, 226, 2 TD, 0 INT, 169.9 rating
2017 - 63.6%, 61, 0 TD, 0INT, 110.2 rating
At LSU:
2018 - 57.8%, 2894, 16 TD, 5 INT, 133.2 rating
The stats aren't so different now, are they?
For the record, I see the point you're trying to make, even though I completely disagree with it. You're going about it in the douchiest way possible (I've been there, done that, so I would know), so you're going to have less folks who want to hear your side of it. Also, you missed his point. He was trying to point out that Nebraska passed on him based on the stats I just posted above and the fact that they thought Martinez was the future. Hindsight is maybe 20/20 on that one, right? In fact, your post kind of helped make his point, douchy as it was. It also makes this point: If you can get a talented transfer at QB, you do it. He might not win the starting job, but then again, he might. The coaches don't have a qb on the roster who has looked like a world beater. Every qb that has played for them over the last 2 seasons has looked flawed and made bad decisions. The one qb who hasn't displayed those traits also hasn't taken a college snap. You saw how bad we are at qb if you watched the bowl game. So why wouldn't you take a transfer at the most important position on the field, hoping he's better than the competition? There is no argument. And you can make your point without coming across as an a-hole. I would bet you're not like that away from the keyboard. Most people aren't.
Edit: Now that I think about it, last season IS, in fact, relevant to the conversation, because it drives home the point that transfer qbs can and do make a huge difference in a team's win total from one season to the next.