MrBamSeydu
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2009
- Messages
- 3,941
- Likes
- 0
I agree that the stars are a good indicator of a player's potential, but I think when there is as much discrepancy as there is with Santos it's fair to be questionable. Ultimately a ton o factors play into how a player develops. Take Randall Conb for example. At UT he likely wouldn't have been THE guy, and he may not have played with the chip on his shoulder that he did at Kentucky. Who knows...
It's not an exact science, no.
But look at the teams who have won national championships in the past decade or so. Tebow, Reggie Bush, Vince Young, etc.
It matters. It's not perfect, but I'll take 20 5-star players over 20 3-star players all day long.
Agree? Would anyone disagree with me there? Generally speaking?

