Indianavol4eva
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2008
- Messages
- 15,045
- Likes
- 1
Negative. Us getting Chaz makes it a wash. Otherwise, they get Chaz and us nothing. Not a good trade.
i am a HUGE chaz green fan, but chaz vs seantrel is not a "wash" imo. seantrel is superior, a very very special player
best case, seantrel goes to ohio state, and we get chaz. i would like that very much
He's a great tackle, as is Chaz. Both are difference makers. It isn't a wash, but it's close. Each of us getting one is great for us. Them getting one and us none is an awful outcome, but is extremely likely.
It looks like the Gators can take 30 if they so choose.Florida now has 26 commits after that qb committed this weekend. How many can they take? S. Henderson has been thought to be a UF lean. How many more can they back count since they have already reached their 25 limit?
well the point was to curb schools like Ole Miss and to a lesser extent Alabama signing a bunch of high schoolers who won't qualify. Both of the players Florida might flex have already qualified.Ugh, more proof that Mike Slive and the SEC are a bunch of morons. That rule should have never been implemented, and just begs teams to look for ways around it.
He's a great tackle, as is Chaz. Both are difference makers. It isn't a wash, but it's close. Each of us getting one is great for us. Them getting one and us none is an awful outcome, but is extremely likely.
well the point was to curb schools like Ole Miss and to a lesser extent Alabama signing a bunch of high schoolers who won't qualify. Both of the players Florida might flex have already qualified.
I could see the concern about using grayshirts to get around the rule but I don't really see the big deal about post graduate Travon Van because JUCOs who sign in December or after the window closes also would not count against the SEC limit. So with the presence of Matt Simms, Tennessee can already sign 29 players in this class.
Ok, I'm not positive if it looked liked this the last time I checked Chaz Green out on Rivals, but this shows he has high interest in UT and medium on Florida. Seems like last time I looked at him (been a few months) he had most of the top schools at "medium" interest and no schools as "high" interest???
Rivals.com Prospect Rankings
Scroll Down to his name and click on "list".
Is this something new or has it been like that?
i don't know where you heard Simms counts against the 28 but the wording of the SEC's limit says member schools can only sign a maximum of 28 players between NSD and May 31. As Simms is a JUCO transfer he should have already signed his LOI so he wouldn't fall into that window.It has been my understanding that Simms counts as part of our 28. Then again, I don't know if I've seen a number that we know is set in stone for UT. Either way, nothing personal towards UF meant by my post. I'm just irritated that schools like UT who are short on scholarship players due to coaching changes cannot sign enough players to fill out the roster. I'm pretty sure it'll take two-three more years of signing 28 players for UT to get back to 85 scholarship players.
