You sure?
I find it hypocritical that she takes the 5th, which is a Constitutional right, and then she so easily disregards the Constitution to further the cause of the Democratic Socialists in Washington
Don't you agree LG?
Its kind of like an officer who abuses their power and violates the Constitutional Rights of others, then stands behind that Constitution expecting it to protect them
I find it hypocritical that the GOP, which proclaims itself the party of smaller government and less government waste, is spending obscene amounts of money trying to score irrelevant and cheap political points with the base.
It virtually never happens in trial because the defending party is always able to have it excluded from the jury precisely on grounds applicable here: it is irrelevant and people tend to read way, way, WAY, too much into it.
Issa & Co. know she is taking the 5th. She was called purely as a publicity stunt by Issa.
Can't say as I blame him. He's used to calls from the media, and being on Fox. But all of these "scandals" are fading and he's missing the attention.
I find it hypocritical that the GOP, which proclaims itself the party of smaller government and less government waste, is spending obscene amounts of money trying to score irrelevant and cheap political points with the base.
It virtually never happens in trial because the defending party is always able to have it excluded from the jury precisely on grounds applicable here: it is irrelevant and people tend to read way, way, WAY, too much into it.
Issa & Co. know she is taking the 5th. She was called purely as a publicity stunt by Issa.
Can't say as I blame him. He's used to calls from the media, and being on Fox. But all of these "scandals" are fading and he's missing the attention.
I find it hypocritical that the GOP, which proclaims itself the party of smaller government and less government waste, is spending obscene amounts of money trying to score irrelevant and cheap political points with the base.
Obama labeled the IRS actions as outrageous and vowed to get to the bottom of it. The committee is justified.
I understand why they don't want to give her immunity since she is one of the big fish but at this point I'd rather here her testimony and risk not being able to prosecute her for misdeeds.
At this point, I'm not concerned whether Lerner gets prosecuted, or anyone else for that matter.
But, LG's thoughts to the contrary, this is a huge issue that absolutely has to be dealt with. The IRS is clearly in need of serious reform, if not complete overhaul. The fact that those responsible for taking our money on behalf of our government can be so easily used as a blunt object against the opponents of those in power is terrifying.
I maintain the best solution to this problem is to eliminate the exemption, in its entirety. An organization, be it political or social, left or right, east or west, up or down, should pay taxes and report donations just like every other organization or institution.
Would that stop the IRS from being used as a political weapon?
It would end abuse of this exemption, both by the political organizations that try to escape scrutiny by abusing it, and by the IRS. I cannot understand why anyone would be opposed to getting rid of the exemption.
Do you oppose getting rid of the exemption? If so, why.
