babyavi
Brickin'
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2012
- Messages
- 4,339
- Likes
- 60
I disagree 100%. If he took it, make him pay it back to some charity, own up to it and apologize for his mistake, suspend him for a couple games, then give him another chance. As far as we know, Mo does not have a history getting into trouble.
More reasonable scenario and better way to teach a lesson imo
Kicking him off the team would be like disowning your kid for breaking a window while throwing a baseball in the house.
Keep Mo on the team and show him the tough love, that is the way true family does it.
Interesting read
The NFL
Wow! Great article. However, understanding the article makes me think that even if we had a defense of 5* All-Americans, we would still be at a major disadvantage this Saturday against Oregon. We'll see Saturday how all this gap talk works out.
Total number of Stanford defensive players drafted in 2013: zero, same as the year before. So why did so many NFL coaches seek out Mason for advice?
Stanfords players might not rival Alabamas in terms of athleticism, but they execute a pro-style, two-gapping 3-4 defense and have football IQs on par with NFL veterans who are trying to adapt to the read-option.
Mason depicts a solution on the whiteboard, showing the unblocked end first going upfield, at no one, and then squeezing down on the running back once he gets the ball. The idea is to let the quarterback make a decision without giving him all the information he wants.
The quarterback wants a fast read all the time, Mason says. If you dont give him a fast read, then things start to break down and he starts to panic because everything is predicated on him being able to make a fast read. Especially in the NFL, because they dont want to get that guy hit. If you come up the field and then try to squeeze, its now hard on the quarterback.
* * *
A slow read forces the quarterback to think more. In football, thinking equals slow, and slow equals disaster. Slowing down the read wont just stop the quarterback, its also important in wrapping up the running back.
I read the article earlier this AM and my conclusion was the success of the defense is predicated on being disciplined in individual assignments even if it looks like the play is passing you by. You have to trust your teammates in their assignments. Once the QB crosses the line of scrimmage it's different; then it's pursuit and leverage.
To your point, I thought it was noteworthy that the article specifically suggested there were no NFL caliber players on the Stanford defense that shut down Kelly's offense.
But this is the money part:
Being a 4-3 single gap defense, though, means that by default we will always be one gap shy from fully defending the option before the ball is even snapped. Add in the fact that we have extreme youth on the corners and a slow middle linebacker, and it starts to become an overwhelming disadvantage. We will see though. Maybe the unblocked end has been properly coached and that will help slow the read down so the defense can adjust on the fly. We will see Saturday.
Being a 4-3 single gap defense, though, means that by default we will always be one gap shy from fully defending the option before the ball is even snapped. Add in the fact that we have extreme youth on the corners and a slow middle linebacker, and it starts to become an overwhelming disadvantage. We will see though. Maybe the unblocked end has been properly coached and that will help slow the read down so the defense can adjust on the fly. We will see Saturday.
Here are the number of snaps for each unit on Saturday.
4 DL, 3 LB, 4 DB 8 plays
4 DL, 2 LB, 5 DB 41 plays
3 DL, 3 LB, 5 DB 4 plays
Being a 4-3 single gap defense, though, means that by default we will always be one gap shy from fully defending the option before the ball is even snapped. Add in the fact that we have extreme youth on the corners and a slow middle linebacker, and it starts to become an overwhelming disadvantage. We will see though. Maybe the unblocked end has been properly coached and that will help slow the read down so the defense can adjust on the fly. We will see Saturday.
I think being humiliated and suspended for a few games will deter others from taking money as much as kicking him off the team would. Plus, players want to know a head coach has their back. Butch has created a family atmosphere and kicking Mo off the team for accepting $1350 seems to go against that. Disciplining him by making him repay the money, suspend him for a few games, and do some additional internal punishment would suffice. I'm glad my family didn't disown me when I had a few lapses in judgment during college.
