What does hiring a football coach have anything to do with propositioning women? I have no doubt he will make a good hire. I just believe that have a good coach for a little bit right after our program has seen some hard times is a bad thing unless that particular coach really loved (and I am talking cares more about being a coach at UT than his paycheck) due to the volatility of the position.
What if Saban decides go back to the NFL?
What if Muschamp doesn't work out at UF?
What if Chizik gets fired at Auburn?
There are too many what ifs and other programs that can proposition a quality coach with more money. It would be better for UT overall by staying stable at gather some identity with a coach like Dooley rather than risk hiring an a$$ h()le that decides to bail on us for a 'sexier' hire.
Then we should have kept the NC winning UT alumni who was never going to leave us. We got rid of him 2 years after a SECCG appearance because we wanted better. If Dooley doesn't improve and we keep him then why did we make a change in the first place?
Because of angry impatient people that keep saying 'OH our coach is on the hot seat because he is not winning' and that mentality persisting over a couple of seasons. People listen, become disinterested and find another team to cheer for. Losing money starts with losing support.
True fans do not start following another team because the fan base gets angry or doesn't like the coach. And I'm neither angry or impatient. I never said Dooley should be fired last year even after the UK game. All I'm saying is that UT deserves the best and so does its fanbase. If Hart decides that Dooley isn't the answer, I trust that he will make the right decision.
Can you guys take your argument somewhere else? Start a new fire/keep Dooley thread or something, but I'm tired of reading threw pages of your pissing contest, trying to find out if anyone has an actual update on Hatcher.
