This is a really good line of thinking.
Here's the problem with welfare:
Those who grow up in it don't know any different. That's just the way they live. They don't have any qualms scaping by and living their life because that's the way it's always been for them. They get used to it. That's their standard of living and sure, they'd like to live in a big house and have a lot of money in their pocket. But is it worth the effort when they grow up in those conditions and become socialized in that environment?
Entitlement programs make things worse, not better. They ensure the cycle continues, so if that's the man keeping the poor down, then yes. I agree.
I read his post and I was called an uncle Tom etc. You know as well as I do that inside the AA community it is just as racist amongst each other. "you too dark" or "high yella' girl with good hair thinks she's something" or "uncle Tom" or "house *****" it's a damn shame.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
You're an Uncle Tom because you see it... I am a racist because I see it. And because we as a society aren't willing to be honest... nothing changes.
I don't agree. In fact, I think programs for the retired and physically disabled should be revamped and made better.I agree that we have no choice but to reduce entitlement spending. What I cannot agree to, however, is doing it in such a manner as places the burden on a part of society that you simply set backwards another few decades whilst simultaneously leaving in tact the wealth of those who benefited (or suffered far less, anyway) during the downturn.
The poor do not have advocates like the wealthy do. And despite the fact that the wealthy are far fewer in number, they get their way far more frequently, because they have the wherewithal to control things.
Pretty clear to me that LG is not a conservative, much less trying to speak for them.
What that tells us is that you only know this problem from aloft some ivory tower.I don't know that welfare "causes" anything. I just find it hard to believe that there are tens of millions of people who would choose to remain in poverty and live on public assistance if there was a meaningful opportunity instead.
We can debate what a "meaningful opportunity" is. But if someone makes the choice to live in poverty -- which is what your comment implies -- then I think you need to ask yourself why and also ask why is it that you think they actually have a choice.
Pretty clear to me that LG is not a conservative, much less trying to speak for them.
He tries constantly though. Just a few posts ago he was telling us what the motives were and were not for the changes we desire in the tax code. He not only falsely assigned racism to me... he called me a racist based on nothing more than my disagreement with him about the best way to see all Americans with the maximum opportunity for success.
uh ok? I'm saying I agree - but that there are many who despise all forms of government help because of the inherent fear i mentioned.
He tries constantly though. Just a few posts ago he was telling us what the motives were and were not for the changes we desire in the tax code. He not only falsely assigned racism to me... he called me a racist based on nothing more than my disagreement with him about the best way to see all Americans with the maximum opportunity for success.
No. I mean more specifically that you consistently make assumptions about the motives and thinking of conservatives... and are just as consistently wrong.That's the part I don't get. Unless he means to say that my characterizations of his motives is incorrect. That's probably what he means.
But, when I read what he posts, and his sanctimonious and incredibly oversimplified and naive "all conservatives help someone genuinely in need" and other similar garbage, I find my perception of him to be reinforced more than ever before.
This is a lie.
You don't care about poor blacks. You don't reject government programs because you think they hurt the poor.
You do it because you resent the black poor people.
what a croc. Most of us don't give a crap about the rest of the people in the world, at least outside of our own world. Asking someone to care about a large group is silly. Pretending that his reasoning for despising government programs is insincere is ludicrous. The programs are by their very nature self perpetuating, which makes them an absolute failure from day 1. If any programs of that nature were not made with the end in mind, they failed. They failed the constituents and the country. You don't have to like that reality, but shoving your head in your ass and pretending that it's a race relations issue is ludicrous. The programs are a disaster when they're aiding milkers, regardless of ilk.