Complete misrepresentation that isn’t close to what happened but carry on.LSU and when the talent dwindled, their fans wanted to give him back just like we did. Ole third and Chavis; “first down”!
Exactly, let’s frame it as it actually was. When he had talent, just as when he was here and LSU, he was good. That’s because talent could mask his decencies. However, he couldn’t get more out of his players who had less talent and he couldn’t compensate against better offensive athletes.Complete misrepresentation that isn’t close to what happened but carry on.
We got rid of Chavis and LSU hired him. Defense there was one of the best in the nation. He also was the highest paid DC in the country. Then A&M stole him for more money. But yes let’s frame it the way you did.
He had some of the best defense statistically in the country at Tennessee and LSU.Exactly, let’s frame it as it actually was. When he had talent, just as when he was here and LSU, he was good. That’s because talent could mask his decencies. However, he couldn’t get more out of his players who had less talent and he couldn’t compensate against better offensive athletes.
Tell that to 2003 Miami Hurricanes and their 6 points….on their field.Exactly, let’s frame it as it actually was. When he had talent, just as when he was here and LSU, he was good. That’s because talent could mask his decencies. However, he couldn’t get more out of his players who had less talent and he couldn’t compensate against better offensive athletes.
Brother he was made the highest paid DC in the country two times over at two different programs. He’s coached at multiple SEC programs and had top units at most of them. I had issues with him at times also but let’s not rewrite historyThat’s because he had some of the best players in the country at both schools. Without those players (talent) his coaching ability would have shown just how good (bad) he actually was. In fact, it was proven.
Beacuse I am killing time before a meeting, I bothered to look it up.Yeah, tell that to the 2002 Miami Hurricanes that scored what, 26 unanswered points.. on our home field.. for our homecoming. Lol
Good point, though.
Talent masks all kinds of coaching deficiencies , not just Chavis, it’s the jimmy’s and joesExactly, let’s frame it as it actually was. When he had talent, just as when he was here and LSU, he was good. That’s because talent could mask his decencies. However, he couldn’t get more out of his players who had less talent and he couldn’t compensate against better offensive athletes.
Florida scored 63 and 59. Steve Spurrier once went for a 4th and 7 at the 50 yard line in Knoxville and they scored a TD on a wide open post route. He was a good DC, not great. We've had betterBeacuse I am killing time before a meeting, I bothered to look it up.
Those 26 were the smallest point total that undefeated and defending NC team scored in two years - up until ohio state held them to 24 in the NC game.
So, I’d say Chavis occasionally did pretty well against superior talent….. and this coming from a guy who was sitting right behind Chavis’ wife in Columba SC one night and accidentally blurted, “damn it Chavis” when Spurrier’s QB got about thirty yards on a third and 20…..![]()
Travelled 8 hours to see that game. C. Houston broke a long run and got CAUGHT from behind at around the 5 yd line. We never got CLOSE again. Totally dominated by UM.Yeah, tell that to the 2002 Miami Hurricanes that scored what, 26 unanswered points.. on our home field.. for our homecoming. Lol
Good point, though.
I just remember his Mustang Package and his Prevent Defense prevented us from winning more than it prevented other teams from scoring. That includes us and LSU.Brother he was made the highest paid DC in the country two times over at two different programs. He’s coached at multiple SEC programs and had top units at most of them. I had issues with him at times also but let’s not rewrite history
Lol Spurrior constantly won that battle when he was at Florida.Beacuse I am killing time before a meeting, I bothered to look it up.
Those 26 were the smallest point total that undefeated and defending NC team scored in two years - up until ohio state held them to 24 in the NC game.
So, I’d say Chavis occasionally did pretty well against superior talent….. and this coming from a guy who was sitting right behind Chavis’ wife in Columba SC one night and accidentally blurted, “damn it Chavis” when Spurrier’s QB got about thirty yards on a third and 20…..![]()
That's funnyBeacuse I am killing time before a meeting, I bothered to look it up.
Those 26 were the smallest point total that undefeated and defending NC team scored in two years - up until ohio state held them to 24 in the NC game.
So, I’d say Chavis occasionally did pretty well against superior talent….. and this coming from a guy who was sitting right behind Chavis’ wife in Columba SC one night and accidentally blurted, “damn it Chavis” when Spurrier’s QB got about thirty yards on a third and 20…..![]()
That’s pretty much the story of every coach. Saban wasn’t all that great at Michigan State either. Only a very very few can win with inferior talent & even they can’t do it very long. Chavis was a very good, not great DC. Some of his best defenses were wasted with Fulmer’s worst offenses. The 2005 defense was elite but the offense stunk.That’s because he had some of the best players in the country at both schools. Without those players (talent) his coaching ability would have shown just how good (bad) he actually was. In fact, it was proven.
