You literally compared one game stat line for VT freshman saying you thought Ament would be that type of player. That is denigrating Ament for no reason.Against northern Kentucky?
He's a good player, I never said otherwise.
I am personally loving Ament, will be curious how he handles the overly physical defense of SEC play though.
Considering Ament was widely discussed as the most raw of the top prospects, what he has done in the first two games has been impressive. And he’ll only improve.
It’s so weird seeing all the Nate Ament hate on social media by non-Tennessee fans. I see all those draft analyst accounts Tweeting out the top freshmen stat lines every night and if you look under every Ament post it’s just a bunch of people calling him overrated and that he sucks. Maybe it’s just because he went to Tennessee instead of Duke or Kentucky as a 5-star but I’m not sure how you can watch his first two performances and think he sucks.
Both guys have 41 points through 2 games, Ament has done it in 10 less minutes and on a better shooting percentage…we gonna do this all year where folks downplay how good he is?
There’s a very clear difference in how these kids move.
Ament lacks an explosive first step and is stiff in the hips. He’s going to be a good player for us, I just don’t see a top 3-5 pick like we were led to believe.
Agreed. He’s averaging 20.5 PPG off 52% FG and 37.5% from 3PT. Got to give him a chance to get settled first.Ament isn’t a finished product. He’s 2 games into his collegiate career. Who’s to say what he looks like in March? I’m not really sure what more he could do through 2 games on limited minutes.
In fairness to you, I just watched the Mercer game and I would have walked away with the same opinion of our rebounding and sense of surprise at the final numbers.Probably because a really bad 5-10 minute stretch of rebounding in the first half sticks out in my mind. I wouldn’t have guessed it looked that way in the box score.
Some of the issue is we want to run, so guards are creeping out at times, or they contest the shot then stand and watch the ball, then a long rebound bounds over the heads of the big men we have in position and guards aren’t back in around the ft line ish to grab the long rebound. Coaches got on guards at least 3 times last game as rebounds hit the floor and bounced before grabbed by the other team.In fairness to you, I just watched the Mercer game and I would have walked away with the same opinion of our rebounding and sense of surprise at the final numbers.
Noticed a lot of that too. Those in-between caroms that seemingly find their way to the floor/players between the bigs and the guards.Some of the issue is we want to run, so guards are creeping out at times, or they contest the shot then stand and watch the ball, then a long rebound bounds over the heads of the big men we have in position and guards aren’t back in around the ft line ish to grab the long rebound. Coaches got on guards at least 3 times last game as rebounds hit the floor and bounced before grabbed by the other team.
