JohnnyD1024
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2011
- Messages
- 7,390
- Likes
- 38,601
We are 38th in victories, 1718-1083-2 (.613). Average of about 15 wins a year. 0 Final Fours. 1 Elite 8. Prior to Bruce Pearl, we had just 3 Sweet 16 appearances in the 66 years between 1939-2005.I’d disagree about historically “sucking” Tennessee is a Top 25-30 basketball program history wise. One of the better SEC ones as well. While not Kentucky, Kansas Duke or UNC but It wouldn’t be fair to say the history “sucks”
I’m looking at Tennessee’s history from inception to now as well as the other 300+ programs in the country. Tennessee is a Top 30 basketball program historically from start to now compared to the other 300+ when you consider wins, win percentage, tournament appearances, weeks ranked, and all of that stuff. Yeah obviously there are alot of down years in there but so have there been in every program not named Kansas, Duke Kentucky etc. I’m not advocating for replacing the Coach. Just the bogus notion that Tennessee basketball history “sucks”. If that was the case then everyone that isn’t a Top 25 program history wise “sucks” out of 300+ programsUhmm...how old are you? After Ray Mears was a looooong wasteland of pure garbage. While I don't think you could characterize the Tennessee BB program as "the dregs of the SEC", it has been the pure definition of "Meh" pretty much my whole adult life until Green had a few decent teams and then Pearl did his thing and then right back to just less than mediocre hell, until Rick Barnes resurrected it from disaster.
I never said it was “great”. I was responding to the bogus claim that a poster said the history “sucked” which certainly isn’t true when we break everything downWe are 38th in victories, 1718-1083-2 (.613). Average of about 15 wins a year. 0 Final Fours. 1 Elite 8. Prior to Bruce Pearl, we had just 3 Sweet 16 appearances in the 66 years between 1939-2005.
In fact, the 1967 S16 appearance only counts because we had a bye to the S16 and lost to eventual runner up Dayton. 1981 was a 48 team bracket and we had a first round bye. We beat VCU by 1 in OT to advance then lost to Virginia (who got third). The 2000 one was the only one in the current format (but no play-in games).
That isn't great. The vast majority of our success has been recent history. In the past 17 years we've added 5 S16 appearances and the lone E8. In the past 17 years it looks like we've averaged 22 wins per season and added a little over a 5th of all our wins. So 21% of our wins coming in the last 15% of our history.
We are definitely becoming a mainstay. But prior to Bruce... maybe "suck" wasn't accurate. But we weren't good.
Yea it’s an android featureMust be using android 12, rolling screen shot.
View attachment 514208
Auburn mods believe Kiffin will be the next Auburn coach.
Thank you! I know it’s mostly emotional reaction to wanting to make a lot of stops. But again… the coaches told us the game plan. Go after turnovers and stop them from scoring. There will be big plays given up, and some at bad times. Teams will be going for it a lot on 4th down because they will be trying to keep pace or catch up. Got to keep this in mind. It will get better when we get better players that can have a while in the system.Through 10 games, Vols are giving up 21.9 ppg. I’m told constantly SEC is the toughest conference in the country. So keep that in mind.
I’ve seen many want a new DC. So let’s take a look at some popular names/defensive HC:
- Zach Arnett (Miss St DC) giving up 26.1
- Barry Odom (Ark) giving up 28.9 (second to last in SEC)
- Oklahoma defensive masterminds giving up 29.1
- Baylor defensive masterminds giving up 25.2
- does the ACC even count? Clemson giving up 21.0 ppg
- Utah - always tough - giving up 20.0
- Oregon giving up 27.4
- Mich St defensive masterminds 25.5
For those wanting a new DC, who do you want?
For reference, the SEC:
UGA 11.9
Bama 18.9
UK 20.0
LSU 21.0
Vols 21.9