HoleInTheRoof
Elite ā ā ā ā ā Poster
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2009
- Messages
- 24,669
- Likes
- 165,569
I may be wrong, but I thought the middle of the field looked open all night as hard as they were blitzing?! Slants, TE seam, and underneath stuff was there iirc.You can blah blah blah all you want, but it's the truth. Hooker didn't have anyone to get the ball out to quick on most of those blitzes. Hyatt was in the slot and had multiple opportunities to be wide open on a slant and instead was running downfield. That game plan works great against teams that don't have the talent to hang with the receivers in man, but UGA's defense is good enough that you have to take what's there and not force the issue. I'm not down on Heupel, Hooker, or anyone else at all...I'm just saying that UGA left some openings and I don't see UT not taking advantage of that in a rematch. I'm really optimistic that this offense is going to be completely ready in a rematch because UGA showed their hand and it would be foolish of Kirby Smart to do anything different the next time.
Conference championship games are almost starting to hurt us. No game and we finish conference regular season runner-up. Add an expanded playoff.
That is true...as we go forward through the years, the team will get used to situations like that I think and learn to shrug it off better.Maybe. I will say if we end up in one of the playoff games the environment will be different than it was yesterday which I think was one of the bigger reasons we played the way we did. OSU is definitely good but we wouldn't be playing them in a totally hostile place
You can ignore what I said but it is also the absolute truth..so..You can blah blah blah all you want, but it's the truth. Hooker didn't have anyone to get the ball out to quick on most of those blitzes. Hyatt was in the slot and had multiple opportunities to be wide open on a slant and instead was running downfield. That game plan works great against teams that don't have the talent to hang with the receivers in man, but UGA's defense is good enough that you have to take what's there and not force the issue. I'm not down on Heupel, Hooker, or anyone else at all...I'm just saying that UGA left some openings and I don't see UT not taking advantage of that in a rematch. I'm really optimistic that this offense is going to be completely ready in a rematch because UGA showed their hand and it would be foolish of Kirby Smart to do anything different the next time.
Playoff chances for Tennessee actually went up lol. 60% entering yesterday per ESPN metrics. 64% now..Watched All Quiet On the Western Front after I seent us kicking FGs.
That said, the other games yesterday were great for us. The West won't get a team in. Clemson is out. OSU looked bad and either them or Michigan have to lose to one another.
It feels like our avenue to making it in is still very very alive. Just win out.
Also...for all their players that can "hang with us in man"...there were still wide open, game breaking, defense busting plays to be made.You can blah blah blah all you want, but it's the truth. Hooker didn't have anyone to get the ball out to quick on most of those blitzes. Hyatt was in the slot and had multiple opportunities to be wide open on a slant and instead was running downfield. That game plan works great against teams that don't have the talent to hang with the receivers in man, but UGA's defense is good enough that you have to take what's there and not force the issue. I'm not down on Heupel, Hooker, or anyone else at all...I'm just saying that UGA left some openings and I don't see UT not taking advantage of that in a rematch. I'm really optimistic that this offense is going to be completely ready in a rematch because UGA showed their hand and it would be foolish of Kirby Smart to do anything different the next time.
Georgia still probably wins if we hit those plays. But like you were saying. It makes everyone feel a bit better putting 30 on the board than it would only 13 feeling like they were the great wall of china defenseAlso...for all their players that can "hang with us in man"...there were still wide open, game breaking, defense busting plays to be made.
If they win in that scenario it is because of their offense beating our undermanned defense, not because of our offense sputtering out. That would look and feel a lot different.Georgia still probably wins if we hit those plays. But like you were saying. It makes everyone feel a bit better putting 30 on the board than it would only 13 feeling like they were the great wall of china defense