MSME Vol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,174
- Likes
- 1,871
All you showed was great amounts of correlation to success
60% is great. Probably better than the draft.
AP top 25 is notoriously bad (compared to Vegas that puts their money where their mouth is) and yet even your (1 year lol) ap poll shows a strong correlation to success.
You're just digging your hole greater and greater. Maybe looking for perfection. As any NFL front office will tell you, there's no such thing. But there are strong predictive measures. Bet against the blue chip ratio all you want. Take all the 3 stars. Lose again with your ignorance. Hopefully you don't gamble real money...all like "this market index doesn't go up EVERY day...it's clearly a loser"
So you're already backing down by letting go of the top 5I would LOVE to see you try to prove that point for teams with composite talent outside the top 5.
Again, when considering polls, feel free to drop the non P-5 programs from the rankings and the recruiting services STILL aren't accurate. Nineteen P-5 teams finished in the top 25. To get there, they had to beat other P5 teams. Only 8 were top 25 talent composites according to 247.
Outside of Bama and UGA they weren't even accurate for the SEC. The other 3 ranked SEC teams were ALL outside the top 25 in 247's composite.
@Geaux_VolsWe are looking at refreshing some of our design work and need some graphic design help. If you have graphic design experience or know someone that does, please email me will@spyresports.com.
We can compensate with tickets, gear, money, whatever you’re interested in. Just looking for some options moving forward.
No. I never said any different. The top 5 are pretty easy. Find out who Saban, Smart, Dabo, and Day are recruiting... Almost anyone could do that.So you're already backing down by letting go of the top 5
LOL... maybe you should "just stop". They're accurate when they can "copy someone else's work" and get MUCH less accurate when it is more THEIR evaluations.Dude. Just stop. Look at the top 15. Compare to the bottom 15 team talent composites. Just...no.
Nope. I made a point and backed it up. You made a claim then took shots at me rather than proving it out.It's not worth anyone's time. This is madness. Have fun ignoring reality all you like. Peace
LOL. There are several in this conversation. I'm making claims then providing factual support for what I'm saying. If that's too "contrarian" for you... then go argue with yourself somewhere.I’ll take your least winded retort as an acknowledgement of defeat. I take it you don’t know much about the social sciences and that’s ok. Some people are just contrarians so much so that they’d argue with themselves.
View attachment 475621
Some of you would be dead right now.
I wonder how many times throughout out lives we've walked right by them and never had a clue?
Anyone who's spent a decent amount of time in the woods from spring to fall has undoubtedly been within touching distance without knowing it. That should also tell you how reluctant they are to actually bite.View attachment 475621
Some of you would be dead right now.
I wonder how many times throughout out lives we've walked right by them and never had a clue?
I once picked up and carried a roll of roofing felt by sticking my fingers in the ends. When I unrolled it, there was a copperhead in it. Had apparently crawled into its center b/c the black roll had been solar-heating.Anyone who's spent a decent amount of time in the woods from spring to fall has undoubtedly been within touching distance without knowing it. That should also tell you how reluctant they are to actually bite.
I personally know more people that have stepped on or accidentally grabbed them than I know people who've been bitten.
Copperheads are also fairly mild. Many bites need no antivenin treatment and in the last 40+ years there's only been 1 copperhead snakebite death in TN... and that dude had an anaphylactic response because he'd been bitten once before. Both times he'd been handling the snakes that bit him. For the vast majority of bites the concern is just the degree of tissue and nerve damage which is usually a factor of time until treatment starts. Many people have no lingering effects, some have long-term tissue or nerve damage around the affected area.
I know where it's at and still almost missed it,
Anyone who's spent a decent amount of time in the woods from spring to fall has undoubtedly been within touching distance without knowing it. That should also tell you how reluctant they are to actually bite.
I personally know more people that have stepped on or accidentally grabbed them than I know people who've been bitten.
Copperheads are also fairly mild. Many bites need no antivenin treatment and in the last 40+ years there's only been 1 copperhead snakebite death in TN... and that dude had an anaphylactic response because he'd been bitten once before. Both times he'd been handling the snakes that bit him. For the vast majority of bites the concern is just the degree of tissue and nerve damage which is usually a factor of time until treatment starts. Many people have no lingering effects, some have long-term tissue or nerve damage around the affected area.
That's not a player we want. I hear he has no testicular fortitude....If we can recruit the Iron Islands we can recruit Georgia by God. View attachment 475644