Amateur Hour Continues

#42,076
#42,076
lawgator1 said:
Doesn't matter the reason they were built originally. Plus they are maintained with tax dollars. Plus they are expanded with tax dollars. Plus they are patrolled with tax dollars.

You have proof they were built with gas tax dollars? That's a ridiculous assertion.

No one is claiming that the purpose of EV is to re-pay the cost of roads. The point of EV is improved efficiency.

So you lose every point you are making. In spectacularly calamitous fashion.
Click to expand...
Every point you just made is typical liberal gibberish.

Once again, none of the costs of building roads, maintaining the roads, and patrolling the roads are included in transportation costs. Nevertheless, the cost of building roads is paid by taxes levied on the sale of gasoline. If you are an actual attorney (highly doubtful), you must be a public defender.

You started this particular discussion with the remarkably uninformed question of "Why should taxpayers foot the bill for your gas to be transported over public roads?" Now that it's been clearly shown that it is demonstrably false that taxpayers foot the bill for gas to be transported over public roads, you are attempting the typical liberal strategy to change the conversation to try to distract from how clueless you are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman
#42,077
#42,077
Vol423 said:
Every point you just made is typical liberal gibberish.

Once again, none of the costs of building roads, maintaining the roads, and patrolling the roads are included in transportation costs. Nevertheless, the cost of building roads is paid by taxes levied on the sale of gasoline. If you are an actual attorney (highly doubtful), you must be a public defender.

You started this particular discussion with the remarkably uninformed question of "Why should taxpayers foot the bill for your gas to be transported over public roads?" Now that it's been clearly shown that it is demonstrably false that taxpayers foot the bill for gas to be transported over public roads, you are attempting the typical liberal strategy to change the conversation to try to distract from how clueless you are.
Click to expand...


So tax electricity production used for EVs.

Oh wait. We do that.
 
#42,086
#42,086
Velo Vol said:
I don't think @utvolpj or the St. Louis Fed are socialists.
Click to expand...
If that’s what they’re arguing (and they are if they are saying that the Paycheck Protection Plan should not have been a regressive program), then they are socialists. They just aren’t admitting it. That program is by its very defintion regressive in nature. It gives benefits equal to employees’ pay levels. In order to make it non-regressive, you would have to give high paid employees’ salaries to low paid employees. That is a socialist program.
 
#42,088
#42,088
lawgator1 said:
Doesn't matter the reason they were built originally. Plus they are maintained with tax dollars. Plus they are expanded with tax dollars. Plus they are patrolled with tax dollars.

You have proof they were built with gas tax dollars? That's a ridiculous assertion.

No one is claiming that the purpose of EV is to re-pay the cost of roads. The point of EV is improved efficiency.

So you lose every point you are making. In spectacularly calamitous fashion.
Click to expand...

EVs are not more efficient
 
#42,096
#42,096
IluvdoubleD's said:
What in the world did this dude do now?... Jim Jordan Quietly Deletes Tweet Calling 10-Year-Old’s Abortion a ‘Lie’
Click to expand...
For those to lazy to open the link..........

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) quietly scrubbed a tweet he posted Tuesday that branded the story of a 10-year-old rape victim who had to travel out of Ohio for an abortion a “lie.” After the alleged perpetrator was arrested Tuesday and appeared in court Wednesday, Jordan deleted the tweet but offered no apology or acknowledgement. Instead, he tweeted that the alleged rapist should be “prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.” In his original tweet, he re-tweeted a statement from Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, who had also suggested the rape was a hoax, and wrote, “Another lie. Anyone surprised?” The tweet was re-tweeted by the House GOP Judiciary Committee. Yost issued a statement Wednesday acknowledging that the horrific incident appeared to be true.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top