Gun control debate (merged)

All of mine are loaded , distributed equally throughout my house , and are always ready in case they are needed . If I wanted just a hunk of metal , I would have gotten bats or hammers .
raw
 
How does hunting and target practice make a home with a gun statistically safer than a home without a gun?

I can’t speak for anyone but myself because it’s a choice you have to make but , if you break into my home while I’m there … I will shoot you . It’s that simple for me and I don’t care what stat you put that statement into .
 
Last edited:
Wow only 85K. That’s no big deal, nothing needs to change it’s just 85K. I honestly think our healthcare system in this country is a bigger problem than the gun laws. To get help here it’s too expensive, you pay for health insurance then still pay a ton for whatever you need. People who have severe mental illnesses can’t afford it and the ones who do anyways end up in debt their entire lives.
I would agree gun violence is a big issue. I dont think many/any on here would argue otherwise.

The point is how big a problem is it. The media blasts it so it feels like a bigger problem than it is. Overall the number of gun violence is up from the 60s, but the rate is down. Our population has almost doubled so that makes since. The rate of gun violence descending says to me we already have an effective strategy in place. People just get caught by the media story pulling on their feels and forget the larger picture. Which is why none of the gun grabbers will discuss actual stastics.

More than half of those gun deaths are also from suicide.

My stake with health care is until we do better at prevention costs are going to go up. We are unhealthy, and old. So yes our costs are up as an average. Get people moving and with less demand on HC you will see costs adjust down so that the people who need help, thru no fault of their own, can get it. Otherwise we are rearranging deck chairs.
 
To quote Jim Jefferies:

There is one argument and one argument alone for having a gun, and this is the argument… “f*** off. I like guns.” It’s not the best argument, but it’s all you’ve got. And there’s nothing wrong with it. There’s nothing wrong with saying, “I like something. Don’t take it away from me.” But don’t give me this other bulls**t. The main one is, “I need it for protection. I need to protect me. I need to protect my family.” Really? Is that why they’re called “assault rifles”? Is it? I’ve never heard of these f***ing “protection rifles” you speak of
Very very few people with a rifle calls it an assault rifle. It's mostly a term outsiders has wrongly attached to rifles to make them seem worse than they are so they can make the above emotional argument.

And also even if you want to accept the label of assault rifle, it's an extremely lazy argument to equate all guns to assault rifles. This person never heard of a pistol, probably the most common gun of choice for personal defense? Where are the assault pistol Mr. Jefferies? Assault shot guns? Assault bolt action rifles? Assault revolvers, assault deringers?

The entire argument against guns is "I dont like guns", which is fine as Mr. Jefferies points out. But they do not make you any less safe than you were before. As has been pointed out the rate of gun violence is going down faster than our population grows. It's just now the media blows up every story, that fits their narrative. If you need an example of the media only playing to the narrative look at the Tulsa hospital shooting.
 
Wonder what sort of special doors these other countries have?



The tree of Liberty must be continually be replenished by the blood of patriots and tyrants alike. Maybe we should have Children's Memorial Day where we honor their sacrifices so that we can be reminded of our rights.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top